Quizzes & Puzzles9 mins ago
Is it an offence to take a photograph from a car?
Police have shamed 80 drivers who took photographs of a crash on the M1.
Pictures of them appear in todays Daily Mail and the story says they have committed an offence by using a camera while driving.
It is the first time I have heard of that. Are they telling Porkies?
Drivers committed an offence by using phones and cameras at the wheel
http://
They were undeniably ghoulish but is it right to publish their photos?
Pictures of them appear in todays Daily Mail and the story says they have committed an offence by using a camera while driving.
It is the first time I have heard of that. Are they telling Porkies?
Drivers committed an offence by using phones and cameras at the wheel
http://
They were undeniably ghoulish but is it right to publish their photos?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It is an offence to use a mobile phone in a car, so is it any difference using a mobile phone/camera?
As regards publishing their photos I cannot see any photos that identify the drivers.
But if they were to, yes I agree they should be published for all to see, not just for being ghoulish but such actions as slowing down on a motorway to take pictures could cause a multi vehicle pile-up, and maybe a loss of life.
As regards publishing their photos I cannot see any photos that identify the drivers.
But if they were to, yes I agree they should be published for all to see, not just for being ghoulish but such actions as slowing down on a motorway to take pictures could cause a multi vehicle pile-up, and maybe a loss of life.
Traffic slows to a crawl as you pass accidents on the opposite carriageway. They are likely not to have slowed down deliberately, but because they had to. There are 2 photos in the Daily Mail that are definitely not phones but cameras. I am sure you could identify the person in the main photo (using camera not a phone). Can they be certain these were drivers and not passengers? There are a lot more foreign cars driving on motorways.
Baldric
Have a look at the link in the question.
Gromit - whilst there's no specific law governing the taking of pictures from a moving vehicle, I think the drivers could get a warning for driving without due care and attention.
My guess is that they won't actually face prosecution because nothing came of it (ie. they didn't cause an accident themselves).
Some eople are very weird when it comes to accidents.
A teenager got knocked down and seriously injured outside outside our offices last week. A crowd gathered on the street to observe the emergency services.
It took the paramedics a while to get her stabilised before transporting the kid to hospital, and in all that time, the crowd just stood gawping.
Have a look at the link in the question.
Gromit - whilst there's no specific law governing the taking of pictures from a moving vehicle, I think the drivers could get a warning for driving without due care and attention.
My guess is that they won't actually face prosecution because nothing came of it (ie. they didn't cause an accident themselves).
Some eople are very weird when it comes to accidents.
A teenager got knocked down and seriously injured outside outside our offices last week. A crowd gathered on the street to observe the emergency services.
It took the paramedics a while to get her stabilised before transporting the kid to hospital, and in all that time, the crowd just stood gawping.
And there was a recent case of a chap who saw a badly injured man lying in the middle of the street, who stopped his car, jumped out, took a photo of the (I think) dying man with his cameraphone, jumped back into his car and drove off.
...without even contacting emergency services.
Just to reiterate - he took the photo with his cameraPHONE.
...without even contacting emergency services.
Just to reiterate - he took the photo with his cameraPHONE.
The offence is described (s42(D) of the Road Traffic Act 1988, as amended) as 'driving a motor vehicle while using a hand held mobile telephone or other hand held interactive communication device'.
That raises the interesting question of whether someone using an ordinary camera in these cirumstances commits an offence. Plainly they'd commit no offence under this section, as the camera would not be a phone or 'device' for this purpose. So does the fact that the camera is an adjunct to a phone make use of it an offence? Surely not, for the words 'or other hand held communication device' make it clear that it the phone itself has to be being used as such a device; it's the communication which is is the mischief to which the section, and any regulation made under it (there is a reference to construction and use regulations in the section), is directed.
This argument is supported by the magistrate's decision in a case against Jimmy Carr, obviously not binding authority, that using the phone merely as a dictaphone was not an offence.
The drivers could, perhaps, be prosecuted successfully for another offence, such as driving without due care and attention, or failing to keep proper control of a vehicle, but that depends on the circumstances.
That raises the interesting question of whether someone using an ordinary camera in these cirumstances commits an offence. Plainly they'd commit no offence under this section, as the camera would not be a phone or 'device' for this purpose. So does the fact that the camera is an adjunct to a phone make use of it an offence? Surely not, for the words 'or other hand held communication device' make it clear that it the phone itself has to be being used as such a device; it's the communication which is is the mischief to which the section, and any regulation made under it (there is a reference to construction and use regulations in the section), is directed.
This argument is supported by the magistrate's decision in a case against Jimmy Carr, obviously not binding authority, that using the phone merely as a dictaphone was not an offence.
The drivers could, perhaps, be prosecuted successfully for another offence, such as driving without due care and attention, or failing to keep proper control of a vehicle, but that depends on the circumstances.
Latest Posts
Gisèle Pelicot - Husband Jailed...
News26 mins ago
Society & Culture40 mins ago
Case So Bad, Jury Excused From Service...
News59 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.