Seeing his distress at the recent ruling is one of the most upsetting things I have ever seen. I truly am glad that he has finally found the release he wanted.
But his attitude was in marked contrast to Stephen Hawking's, over an almost identical disability.
Indeed it was. My attitudes are probably different from yours, and from Her Majesty the Queen's. Shouldn't we all be allowed the power to act on our own attitudes rather than someone else's?
Bert-h I dont think there is a 'one fits all' attitude when it comes to people with the same disability or medical condition.
Interesting Breakfast news had a piece this morning about a man sufferting from LIS, he wanted to continue living however he also supported Tony Nickelson's right to die campaign
R.I.P. Tony, I am apalled that Tony Nicklinson was refused the right to die when our King George V was given a lethal injection of morphine and cocaine to spare the family any more suffering.
So would I.....saw it with cancer in the old man.....they kept his morphine levels up and the food down so to speak....he didn't know where he was and it spared his suffering.
Things have certainly changed since 1935. It was even worse than Brendan says - that lethal injection wasn't even to 'spare the family suffering', it was to make sure the death was announced in the next morning's quality broadsheets instead of in the evening tabloids.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.