ChatterBank12 mins ago
Dale Cregan - Legend
54 Answers
http:// www.fac ebook.c ...leCr eganLeg end?ref =nf
(deleted - but here's a news article related - http:// www.mir ror.co. ...trol ls-crea te-1331 858 )
Sick Internet Trolls?
or
fair comment in a climate of free speech?
(deleted - but here's a news article related - http://
Sick Internet Trolls?
or
fair comment in a climate of free speech?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I have been waiting all day for someone to start this thread - didn't want to kick it off, i have been too busy at work to write something properly.
I see this purely and simply as the downside of free speech and mass media.
Years ago, the Self-Righteous Brothers would all meet up in the Bigot's Arms and try to out-do each other with how worked up they could get by a perceived wrong-doing by the police to an upstanding citizen who loved his muvver and that ...
No problem, like minds speak to like minds, agree with each other, and go home happy.
Now they have a computer each, and access to a platform for their numpty views.
The best the rest of us can do is simply ignore them - giving them an argument only increases their self of correctness, and solves nothing.
It upsets and offends people - but as I say, it is part of free speech, albeit nasty and ill-formed, but tl deny everyone a voice for their views, however repugnant, takes away the freedoms of us all, so we must put up with it and move on.
I see this purely and simply as the downside of free speech and mass media.
Years ago, the Self-Righteous Brothers would all meet up in the Bigot's Arms and try to out-do each other with how worked up they could get by a perceived wrong-doing by the police to an upstanding citizen who loved his muvver and that ...
No problem, like minds speak to like minds, agree with each other, and go home happy.
Now they have a computer each, and access to a platform for their numpty views.
The best the rest of us can do is simply ignore them - giving them an argument only increases their self of correctness, and solves nothing.
It upsets and offends people - but as I say, it is part of free speech, albeit nasty and ill-formed, but tl deny everyone a voice for their views, however repugnant, takes away the freedoms of us all, so we must put up with it and move on.
to put up a page like this is horrible and people who think that is funny or clever or he was i any way justified in murdering two people, are not people i want to know
but they have a right to their opinion however pathetic, stupid, sick and twisted it is
i don't think pages like this should be allowed its, truly vile and disrespectful and the law does need and overhaul when it comes to trolls
but they have a right to their opinion however pathetic, stupid, sick and twisted it is
i don't think pages like this should be allowed its, truly vile and disrespectful and the law does need and overhaul when it comes to trolls
But what do they deserve Baldric?
Free speech means just that - the right to express a viewpoint, however abhorent that may be.
To start to censor people simply becaause their views differ from the majority goes against the very essence of freedom.
That becomes a route into John Wyndham territory - 'respect the Norm ...'
Free speech means just that - the right to express a viewpoint, however abhorent that may be.
To start to censor people simply becaause their views differ from the majority goes against the very essence of freedom.
That becomes a route into John Wyndham territory - 'respect the Norm ...'
hold your horses here, freedom of expression, speech, if i write a piece on Islam, negative, somewhat inflammatory perhaps, how long will it stay on here, or another forum on the internet, not long i am sure. So if the trolls can speak their bile, why cannot others who criticise Islam, wouldn't you call that double standards.
They have a right to express their views no matter how abhorrent we might find them.
They are not inciting hatred or violence.
One day, one of us might want to express a view that most other people don't like.
In the UK we can. In Pakistan or Iran we probably can't.
In UK, people can chant abuse at returning soldiers
In Pakistan or Iran people doing that would be imprisoned, tortured, killed.
That is an important difference and a good reason for being happy to be British and not Pakistani or Iranian
They are not inciting hatred or violence.
One day, one of us might want to express a view that most other people don't like.
In the UK we can. In Pakistan or Iran we probably can't.
In UK, people can chant abuse at returning soldiers
In Pakistan or Iran people doing that would be imprisoned, tortured, killed.
That is an important difference and a good reason for being happy to be British and not Pakistani or Iranian
In the UK you cannot criticise Islam, we have seen that often enough, flag burning is the least of it. Salman Rushdie is still in fear of his life. He may go out and about, and said that freedom to him is everything, but a cleric has upped the bounty, so if someone bumps him off would you say that was freedom of expression.
-- answer removed --
he has had this fatwa hanging over his head for 23 years, much of that time he has had to watch his back. Someone on here posted that absurd video i believe, the thread was pulled sharpish. I reckon that people are stupidly pussyfooting around this issue of freedom of speech, it seems fine for some but not for others.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.