Should the Conservative's Chief Whip just 'Get on His Bike'?

[vivandorron]

Personally, I think he should resign before pressure is put upon the PM to sack him for his stupidity. The very fact that he has apologised to the policeman, with whom he had an altercation, is enough to suggest that he stepped outside of sensible behaviour and is not worthy of a position in Government; which surely demands a level headed approach on matters.

Ron.

[craft1948]

What's wrong with the policeman just accepting his apology?

[Mick-Talbot]

If you sacked all politicians for stupidity .................. TWR would have to run the country.

[Sqad]

Was it a "big deal?"

Maybe not the brightest remarks and certainly not the one to be proud of BUT...."but for the grace of God go I"

Silly, stupid, arrogant........but a resigning matter?.......naaah!

[Kerosene]

http://www.theanswerb.../Question1172241.html

No disrespect, but isn't yesterday's thread on this very subject not still current? Has anything changed today?

[Sqad]

Kero...ah! well spotted.

[Kerosene]

I just didn't see the point in two current threads on the same subject? After all, isn't it common to see other posters pointing this out where it otherwise happens?

[Svejk]

If the policeman was being a 'jobsworth' you can imagine
how annoying it can be.

[Sqad]

kero...indeed.

[craft1948]

I prefer to post on Ron's thread rather than yours Kerosene..............

[Mick-Talbot]

Yeah , viv's too.

[Sqad]

That wasn't Kero's point.

His point was that two identical threads were running simultaneously, a point "latched on" by other posters in similar situations.

[craft1948]

Absolutely sqad, but as someone who would like to comment on the subject, but who has no wish to go on Kerosene's thread, I'm happy with this second thread being started...................

[sir.prize]

///No disrespect, but isn't yesterday's thread on this very subject not still current? Has anything changed today?///

A totally irrelevant comment; from an increasingly irrelevant poster.

Don't you realise, Kero, you are an annoying individual and you have done a remarkable job of alienating a lot of people on here?

[sir.prize]

///I just didn't see the point in two current threads on the same subject?///

Are you on meths, Kerosene?

You did exactly the same yourself with the two Ian Tomlinson almost identical threads; so why the criticism?

http://www.theanswerb.../Question1171420.html

http://www.theanswerb.../Question1172026.html

[Kerosene]

I absolutely refuse to indulge in such childishness with people who - laughingly - stamp their foot about a perfectly legitimate thread begun the previous evening on precisely the same subject?

For what it's worth, my thread has rather stolen the thunder on this one and all we're having is repetition of sentiments already expressed. Sorry, Ron.

Ron, I'm sure yours was an innocent oversight? No harm meant - I was simply pointing out something which is common on AB when threads 'clash'? But you can't legislate for the 'Watch With Mother' brigade cuhcking their rattles out of the pram, can you?

Good luck to you, anyway.

[Prudie]

Poor Ron, and he only wanted to blow the bloody doors off

[Mick-Talbot]

Wouldn't , ron have had to post his thread first for you to steal his thunder?

[craft1948]

"But you can't legislate for the 'Watch With Mother' brigade cuhcking their rattles out of the pram, can you?"

Would you like your teddy back?

[emmie]

stupid thing to say, but i don't think that it's any worse than fiddling one's expenses...

[sir.prize]

I don't want and don't expect a reply - but quite honestly Kero, aren't you biting your tongue and seething 'cos everyone is right and you are wrong - again?

And again, and again!