Argument 1 ...
I heard a woman on Radio 4 saying that children shouldn't be exposed to sexual imagery. Is she serious? Presumably her children don't have access to computers.
Argument 2
The same woman said she didn't want to have to look at naked women when she was on public transport. Again, seriously? I've never had a guy on a train open up page 3 and wave it at me. In fact, although you see copies of The Sun everywhere you look, I can't remember the last time I actually saw page 3.
Argument 3
It demeans women. Well, on the contrary. What is demeaning to women is suggesting that we are not capable of being responsible for what we do with our own bodies.
Argument 4
It encourages boys growing up to think of women as sex objects. Well, if topless images in the media do that, then you have to ban about half of all the magazines on the market.
Argument 5
You can still have freedom of the Press without pictures of semi naked women. No, you can't. By definition, restricting telling publishers what not to print is inconsistent with a free Press.
Argument 6
It harms young girls because it tells them that their bodies must conform to some sort of imaginary norm. Well, apparently the opposite is true because page 3 features big round boob, little perky boobs, all different types. So if girls see it, it tells them that there is no such thing as "normal" and that all different shapes and sizes of boobs are attractive.
So ...
No, I don't ever see page 3, but I think it would be wrong to ban it.