Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
MP found guilty of fiddling, but escapes an actual criminal charge?
I do not really understand this at all.
If she was declared unfit to face trial for psychiatric problems, why did they not postpone the trial until she was declared fit?
If there was no prospect of an improved psychiatric status, why is she not being treated in an institution?
And if a trial is convened, despite her absence, and if she is found guilty, as she was - why is it she manages to evade an actual criminal charge?
Could she enjoy a miraculous recovery over the next few months, and continue her life without serving a prison sentence or having a criminal conviction against her name?
I really am puzzled by this whole process; It does stink of privilege; one could hardly imagine joe bloggs down the street being able to employ this kind of defence.....
http:// www.gua rdian.c ...ran- bogus-m p-expen ses
If she was declared unfit to face trial for psychiatric problems, why did they not postpone the trial until she was declared fit?
If there was no prospect of an improved psychiatric status, why is she not being treated in an institution?
And if a trial is convened, despite her absence, and if she is found guilty, as she was - why is it she manages to evade an actual criminal charge?
Could she enjoy a miraculous recovery over the next few months, and continue her life without serving a prison sentence or having a criminal conviction against her name?
I really am puzzled by this whole process; It does stink of privilege; one could hardly imagine joe bloggs down the street being able to employ this kind of defence.....
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by LazyGun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Don't worry, I know what depression is, and I know it's no laughing matter.
There was a deliverate flippancy in my remark, but it was directed at her rather than other sufferers or the concept of clinical depression as a whole.
Maybe it seemed callous, but as to the reason for that see my previous reply.
There was a deliverate flippancy in my remark, but it was directed at her rather than other sufferers or the concept of clinical depression as a whole.
Maybe it seemed callous, but as to the reason for that see my previous reply.
joeluke - this lady has not 'become depressed' she has contracted 'Deprression'.
The differerence in an alegory?
Being 'depressed' is spraining your ankle, having Depression is having your leg cut off with a rusty saw, no anesthetic, and an amateur surgeon who likes blood and noise and taking his sweet time.
Hope this helps.
The differerence in an alegory?
Being 'depressed' is spraining your ankle, having Depression is having your leg cut off with a rusty saw, no anesthetic, and an amateur surgeon who likes blood and noise and taking his sweet time.
Hope this helps.
@Andy I am fully conversant with just how serious clinical depression is and can be and the impact it can have upon those genuinely afflicted.
However, someone should be fully entitled to question and be sceptical of a diagnosis of clinical depression arrived at in a person of entitlement at a convenient time for the defendant: a diagnosis that renders her effectively immune to punishment or even reimbursement, without being accused of belittling or demeaning the severity of the disease or being insensitive to the distress of those who are genuinely afflicted.
If she is faking, if she has managed to fool those who have examined her, then she is the one performing an injustice against those genuine sufferers of depression - not those that question her actions or her defence.
Being labelled as soulless or ignorant for questioning the accuracy of the diagnosis in this particular case is both excessive and unwarranted and I find the accusation of yours quite offensive, if I am being honest.
However, someone should be fully entitled to question and be sceptical of a diagnosis of clinical depression arrived at in a person of entitlement at a convenient time for the defendant: a diagnosis that renders her effectively immune to punishment or even reimbursement, without being accused of belittling or demeaning the severity of the disease or being insensitive to the distress of those who are genuinely afflicted.
If she is faking, if she has managed to fool those who have examined her, then she is the one performing an injustice against those genuine sufferers of depression - not those that question her actions or her defence.
Being labelled as soulless or ignorant for questioning the accuracy of the diagnosis in this particular case is both excessive and unwarranted and I find the accusation of yours quite offensive, if I am being honest.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.