http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/pages/the_asylum_process_made_simple.html
I wonder if he had the necessary proof that he had indeed claimed asylum in the first safe country he reached after leaving his own country?
Because this could not possibly be the first safe country, the first gullible one maybe, but not the first safe one.
/// Decisions often depend on whether the case owner finds the person’s account to be believable. There are a number of ways that an applicant’s credibility may be damaged, for example, if they have given inaccurate or inconsistent information. Case owners must also take the applicant’s behaviour into account. For example, their claim may be harmed if they delayed claiming asylum without good reason, or if they have been convicted of a criminal offence such as using false travel documentation, or if they did not claim asylum in the first safe country they reached after leaving their own country (known as a ‘safe third country’).///