ChatterBank0 min ago
Dole Queen's Country House:
81 Answers
http://
How does this woman do it?
Never done a day’s work in her life, yet
Receives £865.92 in benefits
Once live in a vicarage in the idyllic Forest of Dean
Treated her partner to flying lessons, owns a £1,000 parrot, and a horse which costs £200-a-month in stable fees.
And soon to be handed the keys to a £400,000, taxpayer-funded 'eco-home'
How does this woman do it?
Never done a day’s work in her life, yet
Receives £865.92 in benefits
Once live in a vicarage in the idyllic Forest of Dean
Treated her partner to flying lessons, owns a £1,000 parrot, and a horse which costs £200-a-month in stable fees.
And soon to be handed the keys to a £400,000, taxpayer-funded 'eco-home'
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
This lady, who lives in our council jurisdiction btw, has been branded as lazy by her own dad for not working. And yet he admits she's a good mum and the children are great. So she can't be THAT lazy, whatever you think about the 'lifestyle' . Personally I say we'll done to Yeekesbury and I don't say that all that often. Yes she's milking the system but I have more respect for a person in her position doing it than people like Lord McAlpine, raking it in from the (publicly funded) BBC and threatening twitter users with a series of thinly veiled threats
I am astonished at the media bullying of this woman.
She's not the only person in this situation, living the good life at tax payers expense.
She has done nothing illegal; she hasn't cheated the benefit system.
I do feel sorry for the children when they go back to school on Monday - they won't be having an easy time of it.
Whilst I would much prefer my taxes weren't spent keeping families like this I really don't know what the answer is.
I don't want to live in a country that forcibly sterilises women when they have a certain amount of children; or forcibly removes children from their mothers for the sole reason she has too many children and has not got a job.
I don't want to see children homeless.
Getting back to this woman in particular - the flying lessons is unsubstantiated gossip; the parrot may have been a gift. There has been too many very lengthy articles in the media about her, in the Mail particularly. By all means highlight the problem but do it in a general way without naming names.
Let's have the facts - how many families are in her position with a large family and never worked?
Let's have some answers to the problem instead of finger pointing and jeering.
She's not the only person in this situation, living the good life at tax payers expense.
She has done nothing illegal; she hasn't cheated the benefit system.
I do feel sorry for the children when they go back to school on Monday - they won't be having an easy time of it.
Whilst I would much prefer my taxes weren't spent keeping families like this I really don't know what the answer is.
I don't want to live in a country that forcibly sterilises women when they have a certain amount of children; or forcibly removes children from their mothers for the sole reason she has too many children and has not got a job.
I don't want to see children homeless.
Getting back to this woman in particular - the flying lessons is unsubstantiated gossip; the parrot may have been a gift. There has been too many very lengthy articles in the media about her, in the Mail particularly. By all means highlight the problem but do it in a general way without naming names.
Let's have the facts - how many families are in her position with a large family and never worked?
Let's have some answers to the problem instead of finger pointing and jeering.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.