News5 mins ago
Why Are We Giving West Ham Football Club £35 Million
32 Answers
How did we get here?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ sport/0 /footba ll/2188 9864
Were there no contracts?
Looks like really bad financial management from where I'm sitting
http://
Were there no contracts?
Looks like really bad financial management from where I'm sitting
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Gromit, rather mis leading calculations there. The original use of the Stadium was for the Olympics. You cannot factor the whole cost of that into the cost for West Ham
Conversion: £190 million, 2.5m annually = 76 years. Still not good but undoubtedly the rent will increase and it is only rent so the Land and building does not belong to West Ham.
Conversion: £190 million, 2.5m annually = 76 years. Still not good but undoubtedly the rent will increase and it is only rent so the Land and building does not belong to West Ham.
Youngmafbog.
Rubbish. You cannot right off £486million for a fortnight games. Some of that cost (if not all of it) needs to be recouped.
If you see the Commonwealth Games Stadium example, the complete cost is reflected in the rent. For that, the refit and the Original build cost £150million, annual rent £3million, so the tax payer is toatally reimbursed in 50 years.
Rubbish. You cannot right off £486million for a fortnight games. Some of that cost (if not all of it) needs to be recouped.
If you see the Commonwealth Games Stadium example, the complete cost is reflected in the rent. For that, the refit and the Original build cost £150million, annual rent £3million, so the tax payer is toatally reimbursed in 50 years.
// But Johnson's stance was opposed by Conservatives on the Greater London Authority, who called for the West Ham deal to be scrapped.
"The decision to give West Ham the Olympic stadium means Londoners and the nation's taxpayers have been landed with a poor deal," said their spokesman Andrew Boff.
"It is a disgrace that another £25m from the public purse will now be used to prop up this agreement.
"The deal should be scrapped immediately and a commercially viable alternative explored as a matter of urgency." //
"The decision to give West Ham the Olympic stadium means Londoners and the nation's taxpayers have been landed with a poor deal," said their spokesman Andrew Boff.
"It is a disgrace that another £25m from the public purse will now be used to prop up this agreement.
"The deal should be scrapped immediately and a commercially viable alternative explored as a matter of urgency." //
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.