ChatterBank9 mins ago
David Milliband, The Big Sulk To Stand Down As Mp
// David Miliband is planning to leave Parliament to move to the US to work for a charity, a close friend has confirmed to the BBC.
He is going to take up what is described as a "big international job based in New York". //
Good riddance?
He is going to take up what is described as a "big international job based in New York". //
Good riddance?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.it's a shame people don't broaden their work experience like this before becoming MPs in the first place; it'd make for better prepared politicians than the usual jobs in law and PR. Presumably it'd be quite a while before he could get back in parliament, should he wish to; but I rather like him myself.
"Brains" is set to join International Rescue... you couldn't make it up!
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -219474 97
http://
I'm guessing the Mackem's won't miss him too much.....
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/s port/fo otball/ article -225563 5/Sunde rland-p ay-Davi d-Milib and-Lou is-Saha .html
http://
so David goes to NY to work for a charity, why doesn't he stay here and work for one, or is it he is hoping it's a stepping stone to bigger and greater things on the worlds stage, he would in my opinion have made a better leader than his brother Ed, then again NJ has it right, a rather idiot based voting system done for him..
"Idiot based voting system"?
Let's not lose sight of the fact that Cameron became Tory leader simply because the backwoodsmen and blue-rinsed ladies of the shires were wildly impresssed by his ability to make a speech without notes. Apparently, they were unaware that jobbing actors the length and breadth of the land manage to do just that almost every evening of the week! Until that 'achievement' emerged, David Davies was a shoo-in. From what I hear from Tories nowadays, few of them are too happy with the choice they DID make!
It's good to see, Em, that you've finally dropped your beloved "knife-in-the-back" scenario and grasped that the Labour electoral system was precisely what I told you it was and that both brothers knew perfectly well what that system was. Well done!
Given that David Miliband has shown not the slightest tendency to emulate the Ted Heath attitude to another's success, what evidence exists of his being a 'sulk'?
Let's not lose sight of the fact that Cameron became Tory leader simply because the backwoodsmen and blue-rinsed ladies of the shires were wildly impresssed by his ability to make a speech without notes. Apparently, they were unaware that jobbing actors the length and breadth of the land manage to do just that almost every evening of the week! Until that 'achievement' emerged, David Davies was a shoo-in. From what I hear from Tories nowadays, few of them are too happy with the choice they DID make!
It's good to see, Em, that you've finally dropped your beloved "knife-in-the-back" scenario and grasped that the Labour electoral system was precisely what I told you it was and that both brothers knew perfectly well what that system was. Well done!
Given that David Miliband has shown not the slightest tendency to emulate the Ted Heath attitude to another's success, what evidence exists of his being a 'sulk'?
qm, still think that most people including David expected to take the job, and that his brother who wasn't seen, certainly initially as a contender for the role nicked it, stabbed in the back, or just going for the main chance. Makes no odds now the reason, he has the job and will god help up probably be the next PM
It was said on the Today program earlier this morning, that David was going to America, "in order not to steal the limelight from his brother Ed"
I'm not how this can possibly be true. I can't remember the last time David was even mentioned in the media, let alone being in danger of stealing anybody's light.
.
The only reason we are talking about him this morning is because he is going to the States. 24-48 hours later this week it just as likely that he won't be mentioned again until he does something different again.
Andy Warhol was right...we will all be famous for 15 mins, as long as we live long enough !
I'm not how this can possibly be true. I can't remember the last time David was even mentioned in the media, let alone being in danger of stealing anybody's light.
.
The only reason we are talking about him this morning is because he is going to the States. 24-48 hours later this week it just as likely that he won't be mentioned again until he does something different again.
Andy Warhol was right...we will all be famous for 15 mins, as long as we live long enough !
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.