ChatterBank2 mins ago
Why Was This Savage Out On The Streets?
http://
He'd done it before, why was he even at liberty?
"Jaji was sentenced to a 10-month detention and training order but was not registered as a sex offender. ", words fail me. I'm just gutted for the latest victim and her family.
He'd done it before, why was he even at liberty?
"Jaji was sentenced to a 10-month detention and training order but was not registered as a sex offender. ", words fail me. I'm just gutted for the latest victim and her family.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Titehead. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I have no idea. Caught part of this story on News 24 earlier. It is unclear to me why he only received a 10 month detention for the previous assault, or why he was not put on the sex offenders register.
You cannot blame the girl or her family if they were to blame the justice system for contributing to what she had to go through. This guy really should be locked away.
And I know that a defendants past history is often not related to the court on the grounds that it might prejudice the courts findings - but where such a past history points to a history of the type of offence that they are currently being tried for, it seems to me it probably should be made available....
You cannot blame the girl or her family if they were to blame the justice system for contributing to what she had to go through. This guy really should be locked away.
And I know that a defendants past history is often not related to the court on the grounds that it might prejudice the courts findings - but where such a past history points to a history of the type of offence that they are currently being tried for, it seems to me it probably should be made available....
Gromit, what do you have against R1, why do you assume anyone taking up a stance is R1. Is it you getting them banned becasue you are unable to formulate an argument against them so the best way is to shut them up by getting them banned.
Oh yes, I forgot Comrade, that's the way of the left isn't it - Russia, N Korea, China.
Titehead. Apologies for hijacking your post a bit here but some on this site seem to think they are god.
I totally agree with your sentiments, it absolutely beggars belief, the lunatics (right-on Pinko's) have taken over the asylumn.
Oh yes, I forgot Comrade, that's the way of the left isn't it - Russia, N Korea, China.
Titehead. Apologies for hijacking your post a bit here but some on this site seem to think they are god.
I totally agree with your sentiments, it absolutely beggars belief, the lunatics (right-on Pinko's) have taken over the asylumn.
Yet another extremely serious dangerous sexual predator given a ridiculously short custodial sentence for a very serious crime and goes on to re-offend in a crime that could have been prevented.
LG, here is a link, if interested, to bad character evidence used very commonly nowadays
http://
LG, here is a link, if interested, to bad character evidence used very commonly nowadays
http://
LG, yes, since 2005 (prior to that it was rather restricted during trial).
According to the media, previous history was disclosed during this trial.
From the BBC
'Throughout the case Jaji denied his involvement in the assault.
But during the trial the jury was also told that he had pleaded guilty to previously sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl in 2011.
According to the media, previous history was disclosed during this trial.
From the BBC
'Throughout the case Jaji denied his involvement in the assault.
But during the trial the jury was also told that he had pleaded guilty to previously sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl in 2011.
I don't know why he wasn't on the sex offenders register. Under 18s can be placed on it and the offence he was convicted of was one covered by the act.
Looks like they will be investigating why it did not happen, however I doubt that would have prevented this attack.
I am surprised that after having been prosecuted for sexual assault a community service order was thought appropriate for having 600 indecent images of children a year later.
I notice that possession of sexual images of children is an 'either way' offense which makes me think perhaps such cases should not be entrusted to magistrates as this one was
Looks like they will be investigating why it did not happen, however I doubt that would have prevented this attack.
I am surprised that after having been prosecuted for sexual assault a community service order was thought appropriate for having 600 indecent images of children a year later.
I notice that possession of sexual images of children is an 'either way' offense which makes me think perhaps such cases should not be entrusted to magistrates as this one was
Ta LG, No probs, law of evidence is a complex subject.
Jake, when I say that this crime 'could' have prevented I am referring to the fact that the first sentence should have been proportionate to the offence and one would have hoped he would have still been detained. It's about time some one sued the MoJ for neglect and failure to provide a duty of care.
Note in the BBC report that the offender had an additional count of rape and another attempted rape left to lie on file.
Jake, when I say that this crime 'could' have prevented I am referring to the fact that the first sentence should have been proportionate to the offence and one would have hoped he would have still been detained. It's about time some one sued the MoJ for neglect and failure to provide a duty of care.
Note in the BBC report that the offender had an additional count of rape and another attempted rape left to lie on file.
