What Can I Give My Dog For Tooth Pain?
Animals & Nature1 min ago
Abu Qatada 'would Return To Jordan'
20 Answers
http://
Dare we hope that the Jordan government agrees to ratify the treaty drawn up with the UK government, or is this yet another wheeze invented by this person's legal team?
Dare we hope that the Jordan government agrees to ratify the treaty drawn up with the UK government, or is this yet another wheeze invented by this person's legal team?
Answers
1 to 20 of 20
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Maybe Qatada's legal team already know that the Jordanians will not ratify the agreement in its present form.
But if they know that, surely the Government knows that. Why haven't we been told by Theresa May if the Jordanians are holding up extradition. Surely not to avoid her own political embarrassment over this case?
But if they know that, surely the Government knows that. Why haven't we been told by Theresa May if the Jordanians are holding up extradition. Surely not to avoid her own political embarrassment over this case?
Why answer yours, aog ?Because it bears your pseudonym. That's a guarantee of a certain style in the writing and a certain style of thinking. Had it been signed Jerome K Jerome, Lewis Carroll, or Francis Bacon, were that possible, I'd surely give that priority too.
I think the legal team may sense the game is up and wish to appear reasonable, and not representative of an unjustified overspend of public money.
I think the legal team may sense the game is up and wish to appear reasonable, and not representative of an unjustified overspend of public money.
FredPuli43
/// Why answer yours, aog ?Because it bears your pseudonym. That's a guarantee of a certain style in the writing and a certain style of thinking. Had it been signed Jerome K Jerome, Lewis Carroll, or Francis Bacon, were that possible, I'd surely give that priority too. ///
In the same league as those eminent gentlemen eh? well I am honoured.
/// I think the legal team may sense the game is up and wish to appear reasonable, and not representative of an unjustified overspend of public money. ///
And when has his legal team ever bothered about the overspend of public money?
/// Why answer yours, aog ?Because it bears your pseudonym. That's a guarantee of a certain style in the writing and a certain style of thinking. Had it been signed Jerome K Jerome, Lewis Carroll, or Francis Bacon, were that possible, I'd surely give that priority too. ///
In the same league as those eminent gentlemen eh? well I am honoured.
/// I think the legal team may sense the game is up and wish to appear reasonable, and not representative of an unjustified overspend of public money. ///
And when has his legal team ever bothered about the overspend of public money?
Why worry about overspend? Public relations only. The Derby winner had already left the stable before the door was bolted. But the firms have to live and while they live on public money it's as well to make themselves sound reasonable.
You differ in some ways from those three, aog. Jerome K Jerome's short pieces are not funny at all, though intended to be; his masterpiece, however, took a real journey, three real people and a dog as factual, which they were, and then distorted and exaggerated the facts until they bore little resemblance, in print, to the true story. Francis Bacon wrote excellent short essays, sprinkled with Greek and Latin. Lewis Carroll wrote engaging nonsense of a world that didn't exist though appeared strangely real and logical when he wrote about it.
You bear comparison, aog.
You differ in some ways from those three, aog. Jerome K Jerome's short pieces are not funny at all, though intended to be; his masterpiece, however, took a real journey, three real people and a dog as factual, which they were, and then distorted and exaggerated the facts until they bore little resemblance, in print, to the true story. Francis Bacon wrote excellent short essays, sprinkled with Greek and Latin. Lewis Carroll wrote engaging nonsense of a world that didn't exist though appeared strangely real and logical when he wrote about it.
You bear comparison, aog.
-- answer removed --
1 to 20 of 20
