You do have a point, Chrisgel, that any money that can be saved should be saved, no matter how small it is. On the other hand I don't see that this is the place to save. There is a mess in Syria and ignoring it isn't the right thing to do. Similarly doing our bit to try and help out across the world is something worth doing. Yes, there are issues with money going to the wrong people. Yes, too, there are issues of paying money to some countries who don't really need it. India is often cited as the chief example.
These seem to be to more important questions than some "help ourselves first" attitude that smacks of a lack of charity. For the most part, I can't really claim moral high ground myself and don't usually give beggars money, although if I have the time I'll buy them food and/ or a coffee. That is a nice parallel, though, because it's about the difference between targeted aid, and aid going to places where we don't know quite what will become of it.
OP has provided a link to an article saying that we are giving more aid to Syria, without really justifying his claim that it is going to the wrong people. And, having made that claim, he proposes cutting it all off so that even the right people -- that is, those caught up in a bloody war -- get nothing.