Donate SIGN UP

Tevez

Avatar Image
DaisyNonna | 20:14 Fri 12th Jul 2013 | ChatterBank
18 Answers
Always thought he would weasel out of his community service.
What price justice?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by DaisyNonna. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Has he got out of it then, Daisy ?.
Thanks Mass.

The slimy little git.
He has to pay about 1/2 hour of his wages instead!!
The slimy little git.
Question Author
Oh yes. He is to pay a fine instead. This is after it was reported that his transfer would make no difference and that he would still have to complete the community service.
Would have done him good to spend some time in the real world.
Really makes me very very cross.
£3,000 is nothing to him, but be honest if you had his sort of money wouldn't you do the same.
The Magistrate decided, not him!
I would have made it at least a weeks wages though.
Question Author
Never had or will have that sort of money.
He broke the law, was sentenced and has evaded that sentence. I would not have broken that law in the first place so your question is irrelevant.
No, I would not use money to shirk my responsibilities.
So would I, Mass.
Most people would Daisy, if they could afford it.
Question Author
The magistrate decided.
The magistrate should be removed from office.
What an example to impressionable youngsters (and older fans).
He ought to have been made to carry out his punishment as soon as he was judged. What a farce.
Question Author
Not all people are most people.
all footballers arent all that thick

Cantona after he had cannoned into the swearing fan,
did community service by teaching footie to skool kids

and did a lot of good, motivating wherever he went etc...

The difference was that Canta liked the Mancunians and Tevez doesnt
Question Author
Generalisations are misleading and dangerous. Is that a generalisation? I fear that it may be. But you get the gist?
Yes Daisy it is a generalisation
but it is also slef-referential - that is, it refers to itself, and in this case leads to a paradox.

All generalisations are misleading including this one,

so.... (generalisations mislead) is itself misleading (or wrong)
so... generalisations dont mislead....

see Godel
Question Author
Sorry, he was not on my reading list. Always had problems with mathematical logic.
May I substitute fluttering eyelashes and a blush?

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Tevez

Answer Question >>