Animals & Nature0 min ago
Save The Children!
Is David Cameron using the hysterical propaganda from childrens charities about paedophiles, in an attempt to censor and control the internet?
Answers
I think it's just a vote winning strategy because I can't imagine it doing anything at all to stop child pornography, in fact I think it will make it harder to detect offenders. Anyone involved in something so illegal and so dark and wrong will turn to peer to peer if they are not already using it, and pay for it with Bitcoins or other alternative currency....
15:54 Sun 21st Jul 2013
No, what you said jude was :::: Adults should be left to decide what's good or bad for them.
You are either for or against child porn being on the internet. Make your mind up and stop talking drivel.
I am on record here on AB of being far from a Tory voter but if Dave is trying to do something about child porn, then he has my vote, on this issue at least.
You are either for or against child porn being on the internet. Make your mind up and stop talking drivel.
I am on record here on AB of being far from a Tory voter but if Dave is trying to do something about child porn, then he has my vote, on this issue at least.
If you see child porn...will you rush out and attack children?
If you see a car advert...do you rush to a garage?
If you see a sandy beach...do you rush out and book a holiday?
If you see a food advert...do you rush to the supermarket?
Of course you don't! This proves that porn has little or no effect on anyone. It's all perceived threats, but it makes Cameron look good in the eyes of those who don't know any better.
If you see a car advert...do you rush to a garage?
If you see a sandy beach...do you rush out and book a holiday?
If you see a food advert...do you rush to the supermarket?
Of course you don't! This proves that porn has little or no effect on anyone. It's all perceived threats, but it makes Cameron look good in the eyes of those who don't know any better.
Rubbish, jude. The last 3 - yes, otherwise which would companies advertise? you don't have to do it immediately, but it puts the thought into your head.
Why would any sane person want to look at perverted pictures of minors (including babies and toddlers) being raped and degraded, please tell me that? If that's not what you mean by child porn, what do you mean?
Why would any sane person want to look at perverted pictures of minors (including babies and toddlers) being raped and degraded, please tell me that? If that's not what you mean by child porn, what do you mean?
I'm not sure any of that is the point, just because the majority of people who see it are nothing but revolted by it, does not mean it ought to be freely available. Just because it does not increase the number of paedophile there are does not mean it's a victimless image. there is a victim. We ought to be trying to curtail that. I think this is silly posteruing by the Government but I do think that these peoiple should be tracked down and dealt with very severly.
