Quizzes & Puzzles27 mins ago
Can Abao Naysayers Officially Stop Whinning Now?
27 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ sport/0 /olympi cs/2343 4844
Should this, coupled with the news that we are 12bn up indirectly, put this one to bed?
Should this, coupled with the news that we are 12bn up indirectly, put this one to bed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well the History of that is a bit more complex NJ
The Montreal one in 76 was Gigantically expensive and left the city with a bill that made the eyes water and took a generation to repay.
After that nobody wanted it which is why the Russians picked it up in 1980
The Americans then stepped in, flogged every square inch as sponsorship and showed that you could make a profit
Seol was even more profitable Barcelona scraped a profit then the tables started to turn
Sydney lost money and Beijing was an eye watering $42 billion
http:// www.pag es.drex el.edu/ ~rosenl /sports %20Fold er/Econ omic%20 Impact% 20of%20 Olympic s%20PWC .pdf
http:// www.cbc .ca/new s/canad a/story /2012/0 7/18/f- olympic -host-c ity-eco nomy.ht ml
The Montreal one in 76 was Gigantically expensive and left the city with a bill that made the eyes water and took a generation to repay.
After that nobody wanted it which is why the Russians picked it up in 1980
The Americans then stepped in, flogged every square inch as sponsorship and showed that you could make a profit
Seol was even more profitable Barcelona scraped a profit then the tables started to turn
Sydney lost money and Beijing was an eye watering $42 billion
http://
http://
Barcelona was a classic "legacy" case - helped turn the city into a huge tourist destination
http:// www.ins ights.o rg.uk/a rticlei tem.asp x?title =Barcel ona:+Be fore+an d+After +the+%E 2%80%99 92+Olym pic+Gam es
http://
@3T Are you buying that report the Govt has prepared showing an indirect "profit" resulting from the Games? I remain unconvinced. Several of the projects highlighted in the report as being a direct consequence of the Games were going ahead regardless - Battersea Power Station redevelopment being one such example.
Mind, I thoroughly enjoyed the Games, thought they were great, happy that we had them and overall do not begrudge the taxpayers money spent on them - but it is legitimate for people to question the bill, and to highlight some of the inadequecies - that ticketing arrangement was a fiasco, and having to get the army to step in to cover the Govts and G4S's blushes was pretty appalling.....
Mind, I thoroughly enjoyed the Games, thought they were great, happy that we had them and overall do not begrudge the taxpayers money spent on them - but it is legitimate for people to question the bill, and to highlight some of the inadequecies - that ticketing arrangement was a fiasco, and having to get the army to step in to cover the Govts and G4S's blushes was pretty appalling.....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.