ChatterBank6 mins ago
Is This Really Cricket?
8 Answers
During the tea break, Nasser Hussain is discussing Broad's bowling. He says that the bowler is deliberately aiming at the batsman's ribs and chest. He also says that bouncers must be aimed at the shoulder. Primarily attempting to 'break' the batsman's wicket/dislodge the bails is 'real cricket'.
Deliberately aiming at the higher body is not how we played cricket some years ago. But then neither did we wear all the ridiculous protective headgear.
. . . and the appeals to the umpire for an lbw! Well, screaming in unison like kids throwing tantrums. Absolutely ridiculous. and
not really cricket.
Deliberately aiming at the higher body is not how we played cricket some years ago. But then neither did we wear all the ridiculous protective headgear.
. . . and the appeals to the umpire for an lbw! Well, screaming in unison like kids throwing tantrums. Absolutely ridiculous. and
not really cricket.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The bouncer has always been allowed. It is a valuable tool for a fast bowler, making the batsman uncertain about playing forwards and keeping him on the back foot. What is against the spirit (and the Laws) of cricket is persistent short-pitched bowling. Whether or not this is unfair is a matter for the bowler's umpire to decide. Personally I think they let it go a bit too far sometimes. I also don't like to see it directed at lower order batsmen (although when an Aussie no 11 can come in and score 98 it's probably justified).
Jardine's tactics did not even meet with the approval of the whole England team. Gubby Allen flatly refused to bowl to a leg side field.
Jardine's tactics did not even meet with the approval of the whole England team. Gubby Allen flatly refused to bowl to a leg side field.
-- answer removed --