Technology4 mins ago
It's All Gone Quiet Over The Channel.
20 Answers
How things change, this report was dated 30th August, I wonder what France's position is now?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-mid dle-eas t-23897 775
/// Mr Hollande said the UK vote, in which parliament rejected a government motion supporting the principle of military action, made no difference to France's position. ///
/// "France will be part of it. France is ready." ///
/// He ruled out strikes while the UN inspectors were in Syria. However he did not rule out the possibility that military action could be taken before next Wednesday, when the French parliament is due to debate the issue. ///
http://
/// Mr Hollande said the UK vote, in which parliament rejected a government motion supporting the principle of military action, made no difference to France's position. ///
/// "France will be part of it. France is ready." ///
/// He ruled out strikes while the UN inspectors were in Syria. However he did not rule out the possibility that military action could be taken before next Wednesday, when the French parliament is due to debate the issue. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Probably because you are not reading a French News site.
http:// www.fra nce24.c om/en/2 0130831 -syria- paris-f rance-u nconvin ced-ove r-weste rn-inte rventio n-chemi cal-wea pons
The revelation that there might be air strikes before Wednesday when the the french parliament discuss it, just confirms that Washington has set a timetable (which is why Cameron called a vote when everyone was on holiday).
http://
The revelation that there might be air strikes before Wednesday when the the french parliament discuss it, just confirms that Washington has set a timetable (which is why Cameron called a vote when everyone was on holiday).
There won't be any air strikes, or whatever, before September 9 now at the earliest. So some of the heat has gone out of the situation.
Meanwhile Assad has resumed his slaughter of his people and will no doubt intensify the practice of moving civilians into perceived target areas.
I'm glad I'm not in the position the US and French leaders are in, but I wish them well anyway.
M Hollande will now almost certainly have to seek approval from the French Parliament, otherwise he is going to seem like the "odd one out".
Meanwhile Assad has resumed his slaughter of his people and will no doubt intensify the practice of moving civilians into perceived target areas.
I'm glad I'm not in the position the US and French leaders are in, but I wish them well anyway.
M Hollande will now almost certainly have to seek approval from the French Parliament, otherwise he is going to seem like the "odd one out".
http:// www.fra nce24.c om/en/2 0130830 -france -hollan de-syri a-usa-u k-vote- francoi s
LATEST UPDATE: 30/08/2013 - FRANCE - FRANÇOIS HOLLANDE - SYRIA - UK - USA - WAR
France stands firm on Syria despite shock UK vote
President François Hollande said Friday that the UK parliamentary vote against taking military action in Syria would not affect France’s will to act alongside the United States in “punishing“ Syria for an alleged chemical weapons attack.
France has not changed its position on a possible military intervention in Syria, President François Hollande said on Friday, following a vote in Britain’s parliament against the motion.
Hollande told French daily Le Monde in an interview that he supported taking “firm” punitive action in response to a Syrian chemical weapon attack he said had caused “irreparable” harm, adding that he would work closely with France’s allies to punish Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
Asked if France could take action without Britain, Hollande replied: “Yes. Each country is sovereign to participate or not in an operation. That is valid for Britain as it is for France.”
Hollande in Le Monde: "The Damascus massacre mustn't go unpunished".
Unlike British Prime Minister David Cameron – who lost a parliamentary vote sanctioning military intervention on Thursday – Hollande could, if he chose, act before a French parliamentary debate set for Wednesday.
LATEST UPDATE: 30/08/2013 - FRANCE - FRANÇOIS HOLLANDE - SYRIA - UK - USA - WAR
France stands firm on Syria despite shock UK vote
President François Hollande said Friday that the UK parliamentary vote against taking military action in Syria would not affect France’s will to act alongside the United States in “punishing“ Syria for an alleged chemical weapons attack.
France has not changed its position on a possible military intervention in Syria, President François Hollande said on Friday, following a vote in Britain’s parliament against the motion.
Hollande told French daily Le Monde in an interview that he supported taking “firm” punitive action in response to a Syrian chemical weapon attack he said had caused “irreparable” harm, adding that he would work closely with France’s allies to punish Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
Asked if France could take action without Britain, Hollande replied: “Yes. Each country is sovereign to participate or not in an operation. That is valid for Britain as it is for France.”
Hollande in Le Monde: "The Damascus massacre mustn't go unpunished".
Unlike British Prime Minister David Cameron – who lost a parliamentary vote sanctioning military intervention on Thursday – Hollande could, if he chose, act before a French parliamentary debate set for Wednesday.
The French will follow America's lead and it now looks like that will ve after September 9th.
The French Parliament debates this next Thursday. As France is the ex-colonial power in Syria, they might be more keen to join in. Even if the French Parlament don't, the President can order it anyway.
Germany have already declined the invitation.
The French Parliament debates this next Thursday. As France is the ex-colonial power in Syria, they might be more keen to join in. Even if the French Parlament don't, the President can order it anyway.
Germany have already declined the invitation.
Tora; //The British PM does not need parliament's backing//
"While the Prime Minister officially retains the Royal Prerogative to declare war, it is clear that this power is now tempered by the convention that Parliament must vote on the matter beforehand."
http:// www.new statesm an.com/ politic s/2013/ 08/syri a-vote- was-tri umph-pa rliamen tary-so vereign ty
"While the Prime Minister officially retains the Royal Prerogative to declare war, it is clear that this power is now tempered by the convention that Parliament must vote on the matter beforehand."
http://
Well Ed Milliband rather cleverly ambushed Cameron on that by getting him to confirm he would not use the Royal prerogative
//Asked by Labour leader Ed Miliband for an assurance that he would not use the royal prerogative to sanction British involvement in the military action, the prime minister told MPs: "I can give that assurance.//
http:// www.the guardia n.com/w orld/20 13/aug/ 29/came ron-bri tish-at tack-sy ria-mps
//Asked by Labour leader Ed Miliband for an assurance that he would not use the royal prerogative to sanction British involvement in the military action, the prime minister told MPs: "I can give that assurance.//
http://
// The interior minister, Manuel Valls, said yesterday that there was no question of France going it alone in air strikes on Syria if the US Congress voted against. “We need a coalition,” he said.
Opposition figures pointed out that this had put Mr Hollande in the “humiliating” position of having to wait for a US parliamentary vote before sending in the French military while refusing to allow a vote in France. //
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.