Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Do You Think That The Bbc Did This Deliberately?
Sort the responses into top rated order:
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-24 27431/U KIP-lea der-Nig el-Fara ge-pict ured-sp orting- unfortu nate-Hi tler-mo ustache .html
Really?
http://
Really?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.pixie373/excelsior-1
That would certainly take some organising. First of all, quite a few people would have to be involved including the director of the programme plus the vision mixer and then the technical crew who would have to mock up a fake digital 'pixel drop out'.
When you think of it in those terms, it sounds quite far fetched that the BBC would deliberately leave itself open to allegations of bias, especially as it could quite easily be proven (by tech experts).
I find it quite surprising that anyone could believe this.
That would certainly take some organising. First of all, quite a few people would have to be involved including the director of the programme plus the vision mixer and then the technical crew who would have to mock up a fake digital 'pixel drop out'.
When you think of it in those terms, it sounds quite far fetched that the BBC would deliberately leave itself open to allegations of bias, especially as it could quite easily be proven (by tech experts).
I find it quite surprising that anyone could believe this.
-- answer removed --
No, not an MCC tie.
It looks like regimental tie. The 3rd (foot and Mouth) Regiment perhaps.
http:// 3rdfoot andmout h.yolas ite.com /
It looks like regimental tie. The 3rd (foot and Mouth) Regiment perhaps.
http://
pixie373
It was brought up because the story had broken. What's the point of having him on and then ignoring whatever might be in the news about him?
Surely he's big enough to be able to handle public scrutiny...just like politicians from other parties?
Have you ever seen Jeremy Paxman or John Humpries pulling back when questioning politicians?
Why should Farage get an easy ride?
It was brought up because the story had broken. What's the point of having him on and then ignoring whatever might be in the news about him?
Surely he's big enough to be able to handle public scrutiny...just like politicians from other parties?
Have you ever seen Jeremy Paxman or John Humpries pulling back when questioning politicians?
Why should Farage get an easy ride?
Yes, it was the media i was criticising, not yourself, sp. He won't get an easy ride, but sometimes the reporters/papers make themselves look more stupid than whoever they are trying to ridicule. They have misrepresented/misunderstood the other meaning of "sluts" and asking someone why all the faces are white in a photo is a clearly racist remark and should have been thought out first. Although smacking a reporter on the head with a leaflet is not the most intelligent response.
I don't think smacking reporters will lose him any votes. But I don't think this was deliberate by the Beeb - it looks like a captioning glitch; note that there's another one above his head.
These are the MCC colours, nothing like Farage's tie
http:// www.the times.c o.uk/tt o/multi media/a rchive/ 00181/M CC_9046 3243_18 1327c.j pg
These are the MCC colours, nothing like Farage's tie
http://
// seems odd to me, conveniently under the nose, how precise is that? //
I imagine Farage was moving about a bit on screen. The black rectangle could have been over his mouth, over his chin, between his eyes.
They have just taken a screen capture at a point it was under his nose.
And this is not how it was broadcast to the public. This was a tv screen in the studio possibly in the background. When the live feed from Farage was boadcast, it would not have had the tash.
I imagine Farage was moving about a bit on screen. The black rectangle could have been over his mouth, over his chin, between his eyes.
They have just taken a screen capture at a point it was under his nose.
And this is not how it was broadcast to the public. This was a tv screen in the studio possibly in the background. When the live feed from Farage was boadcast, it would not have had the tash.