Donate SIGN UP

Should These People Be Charged If They Dont Help Themselves?

Avatar Image
youngmafbog | 11:59 Mon 23rd Sep 2013 | News
35 Answers
http://news.sky.com/story/1145189/diabetes-will-create-public-health-disaster

The NHS is quite likely to be bought to it's knees by this. 85% of diabetics are type 2 that can be aided or prevented by exercise and diet.

Is it about time we started to look seriously at this, even perhaps going as far as charging people who do not bother to loose weight and exercise, or even remove NHS treatment? Perhaps if these people had less to spend on Pies and Beer then they would do something about it

Or perhaps the 'pasty tax' was not such a bad idea, after all smokers are clobbered for doing something that is dangerous. If we put a levy on unhealthy foods it could be used to fund the treatment of those that consume them?

I dont see why those that do bother to take care of themselves should have to pay for the feckless.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 35rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Type 2 Diabetes can also be brought on as a side affect from other medication. It is not always caused by 'pies and beer'.
Anybody can get Type II diabetes such as people like Halle Berry, Billie Jean King, Arthur Ashe, none of whom are fat, lazy slobs
you could say that about lots of things though - lots of things we do ultimately result in needing hospital treatment - where do you stop?

perhaps there should be a 3 strikes type arrangement whereby they are warned of the situation and if they take no notice after the 3rd time they have to pay.
Question Author
Sparkels/ HC. Yes of course genetics and ethnicity are factors but they are covered by my suggestion under 'dont do anything bout it'. Providing they exercise and do not eat piles of pies so not affected.

And just for the record, for the pedantic on here it is not just pies and yes I do like pie and I do like beer.
200,000 people were injured in road accidents last year. We should ban cars.

I'm a type 2 diabetic, I've always had a healthy lifestyle,
mine was diagnosed 3 yrs+ back, not long after a major op
(Aortic Valve Replacement, brought about by a bacterial infection which corrupted the valve). I control it by watching my diet, and walking my Dogs into the ground, on a daily basis. NO medicines involved and I have one check-up annually. I honestly don't think I would now be diabetic were it not for that Op. but that's just an opinion, I've no proof.
I meet a lot of diabetics who are 'suffering' because they won't help themselves, and say they don't have the time/willpower to do as I do, I go along to some clinics to speak to people (not preach) and it's shocks me how many think the NHS will bail them out, no matter what, with no effort on their part.
I'd be happy to see a tax on unhealthy foods. I'm not sure how it would work in practice though.
That is a disgusting over generalisation of persons who are unfortunate enough to suffer from any type of diabetes, as regards exercise some are elderly and disabled so much so that they are limited to how much exercise they can partake in.

Yes admitted there is a large rise in cases of type 2 diabetes, but that is largely down to today's methods of being able to detect it, and the fact that we are becoming more aware of it, years ago people didn't know they had it.

Regarding your suggestion that such persons should be charged to use the NHS, but why bother to stop there, why not the drunks who spill out onto our streets most weekends? why not drug addicts? why not those injured pursuing their keep fit activities? and why not those who have more than two kids?

In fact, why don't we just keep the NHS for the use of young fit people, who have no bad habits and don't like kids, think of how much money we would save?
That was directed at the OP.

Aog, you raise a good point (elderly and disabled) however a lot of the people I speak to at clinics (my GP requested I do it btw) are in their 30's with, lets say, time on their hands, but a complete lack of motivation to help themselves.
lets also ban sport, having babies and binge drinking..oh and smoking and drug misuse.
As the robust post from AOG - with which i entirely agree - points out, trying to deny people NHS treatment because of their perceived unwillingness to help themselves is the thin edge of a very nasty wedge.

As a civilised society, it is beholden on us to take care of those less fortunate, for a variety of reasons, which may include perceived stuborness over personal health care - but, as advised, exactly where do we start?

Do you deny NHS dentistry to anyone who takes sugar in their tea?

The best way to avoid such chilling discernment of the 'deserving' is not to start at all - and treat members of our society as equals.
Smoking, Heavy drinking, Dangerous sports, ANY lifestyle that could put you in danger of injury or ANY lifestyle that compromises your health.

Oh that's life in a nutshell ;)
Question Author
AOG

So are you saying there is no problem? Are all the type II diabetics elderly or infirm?

And as for charging it has been discussed about drunks etc, so why not discuss this?

Woolf, smokers already pay a huge tax. Druggies, yes I agree. Each of these things needs to be looked at and discussed - without emotion.

Question Author
Cass, actually why should the public pick up the tab for dangerous sport? If you can't get insurance then surely that is a real problem and the tax payer should not be forced to pay the bill. Expecting them to do so is very selfish.

Just to be clear, I'm not saying people should be charged, but that there are a large number of people out there I've come across who seem to believe that their health is not their responsibility, and seem to be looking for some kind of cure-all pill.
youngmafbog - "So are you saying there is no problem? Are all the type II diabetics elderly or infirm?

And as for charging it has been discussed about drunks etc, so why not discuss this?"

neither of these points were raised in AOG's post - the thrust of his (and my) disagreement, is the opinion that healt care can be dispensed under some arbitrary tick list system, with those deemed not to be 'worthy' being denied because of lifestyle choices.

That is not now the Health System works, nor was it ever intended to be so, and amen to that.
WOW - I have defended AOG on the AB - now that is a first!!! (I think)
Base it on BMI (I know that doesn't always work...) but people classed as obese etc can have their weight related illnesses classed as self inflicted and should pay towards the treatment. Same should happen with drunks. Culture and ethnicity shouldn't have anything to do with it, you don't see overweight people in harsh environments where access to food is limited.
Is horse riding a dangerous sport?

Playing football?

1 to 20 of 35rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should These People Be Charged If They Dont Help Themselves?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.