Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
Pleading Not Guilty ??????????????
67 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-24 34810/P air-app ear-cou rt-vide olink-d eny-mur dering- soldier -Lee-Ri gby-nea r-barra cks.htm l
Have these two 'a cat in hells' chance of being found not guilty?
/// Adebolajo and Adebowale asked to be addressed by their adopted Islamic names of Al Mujaahid Abu Hamza and Ismail Ibn Abdullah respectively. ///
/// After hearing submissions from the two barristers representing the defendants, the court allowed them to be called by their Muslim names as well. ///
More kowtowing it would seem.
Have these two 'a cat in hells' chance of being found not guilty?
/// Adebolajo and Adebowale asked to be addressed by their adopted Islamic names of Al Mujaahid Abu Hamza and Ismail Ibn Abdullah respectively. ///
/// After hearing submissions from the two barristers representing the defendants, the court allowed them to be called by their Muslim names as well. ///
More kowtowing it would seem.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//IMO the changing of names should not be allowed in a court of law//
//More kowtowing//
Nonsense. The same courtesy would be extended to anyone who chooses to adopt a new name.
Given that the mandatory sentence for murder is life, there is little benefit of entering a not guilty plea because they are never going to get a significant discount. They have the right to put the prosecution to proof.
I have no idea what their defences are likely to be, but it is not beyond the realms of possibility that there will be a duress or diminished responsibility type argument. Who knows? Could be just as Rocky says.
And before anyone jumps on the "it's the pond dwelling lawyers' fault" bandwagon, if their instructions are to plead "not guilty", the lawyers have absolutely no choice but to run a "not guilty" trial as per instructions, irrespective that that may fly in the face of legal advice.
//More kowtowing//
Nonsense. The same courtesy would be extended to anyone who chooses to adopt a new name.
Given that the mandatory sentence for murder is life, there is little benefit of entering a not guilty plea because they are never going to get a significant discount. They have the right to put the prosecution to proof.
I have no idea what their defences are likely to be, but it is not beyond the realms of possibility that there will be a duress or diminished responsibility type argument. Who knows? Could be just as Rocky says.
And before anyone jumps on the "it's the pond dwelling lawyers' fault" bandwagon, if their instructions are to plead "not guilty", the lawyers have absolutely no choice but to run a "not guilty" trial as per instructions, irrespective that that may fly in the face of legal advice.
No doubt they pled not guilty to increase their chances of expressing their extremist views to a wider audience and there is also the possibility of any murderer being not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished resposibility.
With regard to a change of name, everyone will know who they are no matter what name they go by and if it reduces the risk of the trial being disrupted it's hardly major is it?
With regard to a change of name, everyone will know who they are no matter what name they go by and if it reduces the risk of the trial being disrupted it's hardly major is it?