// Three Royal Marines, who cannot be named, are charged with murdering the unknown man while on duty in 2011.
One of the men, known as Marine A, is accused of shooting the prisoner in the chest at close range.
The Afghan prisoner had been seriously injured by gunfire fired from an Apache helicopter sent to provide air support, which he described as a legitimate operation.
Mr Perry accused the three defendants of using the Afghan man's injuries as a "cloak" to conceal their own actions, reporting he had died from wounds inflicted by the helicopter.
Courtroom 1 fell absolutely silent as the jurors, legal teams and press watched five segments of video, mostly a few minutes long, which were all filmed on the day -inadvertently for the most part - by one of the accused.
Some in court shook their heads as they watched, though the jurors remained impassive throughout. //
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24639642
This was inadvertently filmed by one of the defendents, and the prosecution brought after it was found on a laptop back in England. Is this stealing of data and using it for entertainment any different from Wikileaks releasing footage of Reuters journalists being shot to bits? Regardless of the verdict of this trial, should they be charged with stealing the data (which could aid the enemy)?