ChatterBank2 mins ago
Now We Know Why Things Are So Cheap At Amazon
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/bu siness- 2503459 8
This is why I won't shop at Amazon. Its little better than slave labour. No unions as well, so nothing to stop Amazon getting away with this. Watch Panorama tonight.
This is why I won't shop at Amazon. Its little better than slave labour. No unions as well, so nothing to stop Amazon getting away with this. Watch Panorama tonight.
Answers
@ummm well we shall see, shan't we? Labour laws should indeed protect us, but such laws surrounding pay and working conditions have been eroded somewhat over recent years, it seems to me. Take the minimum wage, for instance - we know that, by law,all employees are entitled to at least the minimum wage for their labour - but there has been much evidence to...
10:19 Mon 25th Nov 2013
I'm watching it now. Basically they have a target to meet (based on the past performance of employees). If they consistently fail to meet those targets the 'sacking' process takes up to 5/6 weeks to actually being sacked. Most of the people who are moaning about having worked there don't look like they have a day's work in them. They are very hot on lateness and sick leave. The secret filmer is moaning that they are not allowed to think for themselves - but that wouldn't be efficient, so I think he is missing the point. The secret filmer has complained about his blisters and they have moved him to a job with less walking involved. Ok, the bloke is tired, but I expect most manual workers who are doing their jobs properly go hime tired. They are drawing comparisons with a one-man band shop/on-line delivery shop and he is quite a bit more expensive. People can't afford to keep inefficient businesses afloat.
sherrardk...one of the main reasons that Amazon is still "afloat" is, despite a multi-million pound turnover, they pay little, if any corporation tax. The ordinary High St shop doesn't have the ability to evade tax...Amazon does. Nor do High St shops get paid, or rather bribed, by local Councils to open their shops in the first place, unlike Amazon. Not really a level playing field is it ?
Not a level playing field, no. However, big businesses like Amazon play the system (and they are not the only businesses or individuals that do so) and bring lots of jobs to areas that need them. I am not in the business of paying to keep people's dreams afloat such as the independent book shop owner who was bumbling around with his two hapless assistants. If you want, and can afford, to pay 30% more than Amazon charges then it's your money to do with what ever you wish. Some of us live in the real world which might not be palatable but is one in which we can also afford to buy stuff. In relation to the slave labour botox, it was a slight look at a physically demanding job, lots of jobs are demanding. It's was just another excuse to knock Amazon (not saying they are in the right, but they are providing what the customer wants at a price they can afford).
You have moved the goal posts, your original post was about salve labour (or 'doing the job you applied for' as I would prefer to call it). You have now turned it around to the corporation tax angle. I thought you lived in South Wales - would have thought you would welcome the opportunity of jobs for people in the area.
ummm...after watching the program it would seem to me that it is very hard work indeed. Not in itself a cause for concern perhaps but they seem to be imposing nigh near impossible conditions of employment. The program made it clear that Amazon were very selective in the info that it was prepared to give out to the media. For instance it refused to say how many of its non-permanent staff are dismissed. Most of its workers are not employed directly by Amazon. Anecdotal evidence here in Swansea is that the attrition rate is high. Also, because they refuse to allow a Trade Union presence in their warehouses, there is no safeguard in place to ensure to workers are not bullied and mistreated.
Mikey - you have moved the goal posts again, now you are inferring that staff are mistreated and bullied! Surely if they are running around like blue arsed flies there's no time for bullying.
Bednobs - the targets are probably high but incentivising, they don't get immediately sacked if they fail to meet them, although the programme didn't meant what the tolerance was before sanctions would be implemented.
Bednobs - the targets are probably high but incentivising, they don't get immediately sacked if they fail to meet them, although the programme didn't meant what the tolerance was before sanctions would be implemented.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.