ChillDoubt,there is a good reason why an ordinary soldier is only tried people of warrant officer and above. Having appeared for soldiers in courts martial, I can confidently say that the court decides what is best for the Army. The results are sometimes puzzling to outsiders; the sentences are lower than in civilian courts, but the Army does its damndest to only convict on the lowest possible charge. If the man has been a good soldier and the Army wants to keep its image and keep the case out of the headlines, it will. Hence my story of attempted murder in Germany which got reduced to assault and not even a s18 wounding (or gbh) with intent to do gbh, at that. Since the soldier had chased an NCO down a corridor, yelling that he would kill him, and let fire at close range, hitting the victim who, fortunately, was partly shielded by the door he was opening to escape, that surprised even me . Of course, none of this trial and plea got anywhere near the media. Mission accomplished !
Only persons of warrant officer and above are considered suitably experienced to judge what is best for the Army.