Donate SIGN UP

Human Rights. Win For Somali Rapist..

Avatar Image
trt | 13:37 Sat 07th Dec 2013 | News
11 Answers
Where on earth do they get these judges from, and what about the poor pregnant girls human rights, who will probably be scarred for life with the memory's.

Disgusting decision!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2519621/Vicious-rapist-deport--right-family-life.html
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by trt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It seems that this so called human rights act is nothing but a get out of jail free card (no pun intended) for these imported scum from africa and the like

// he did not admit his guilt in prison, he had since owned up and completed a ‘victim empathy’ course while on probation. //

He completed a Victim Empathy Course so we will have no more trouble from him. Oh dear.
" Psychiatrist Dr Harriet Hunt-Grubbe said that Abdullahi would be ‘deprived of the emotional support of his mother and immediate family if deported to Somaliland’.
snip>

After speaking to him for just two hours, she said there was only a low risk that he would commit serious sexual or violent crimes. She said he was ‘depressed as a result of possibility of deportation and from witnessing his brother committing suicide’.

Sending him to Somalia would also increase his suicide risk because he would be unlikely to have access to the anti-depressants and therapy he receives on the NHS.

She concluded that he was a ‘well-loved member of his family and his friendship network and that his deportation would have a negative impact on their own lives’.

The Home Office appealed but this was rejected by an Upper Tribunal, which said: ‘Although he has committed serious offences, he has at last faced up to what he has done and has taken significant steps to put behind him that kind of criminal behaviour.’

Hahahahahahahahhahahaha..cant remember the last time i read such tosh..oh yeah the last time they made the same loonytoon dsort of decision

thats the sort of inept people we have making decisions on our behalf

Gromit

/// He completed a Victim Empathy Course so we will have no more trouble from him. Oh dear. ///

Was that a hint of sarcasm I detected?

What has happened to you today Gromit, that is two such similar reports you have commented on, have you broken your 'rose tinted specs' I hope you don't repair them, because we both now to be singing from similar hymn books.

But please don't stop because I think you have now joined in with the general public view on matters, by this I don't include AnswerBank because some on this don't seem to live in the real world.
Yuman writes? PMSL, anything but, all it seems to serve is criminal low life scum.
What advances have we made here's what the Home Secretary said back in February.

/// It is not in the national interest that this situation continues. What is going on? The short answer is that some of our judges appear to have got it into their heads that Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights, the ‘right to family life’, is an absolute, unqualified right. ///

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2279828/Its-MY-job-deport-foreigners-commit-crime--Ill-fight-judge-stands-way-says-Home-Secretary.html

Agree. It is worrying how widely some tribunals interpret Article Eight. We've always the right to family life as a consideration, well before the Article existed, but it was never interpreted as generously as in the instant case.
AOG
Not quite singing from the same hymn sheet.
I have no objections to muslims. I object to thugs and rapists. The two cases I have written on today involve how the law is applied. In the first one I was mislead by the comments of the QC who got the law wrong. She was not limited in the sentence she could give because the 3 men were rightly (in the eyes of the law) not charged with a religiously aggravated.

In this case, the interpretation of 'a family life' seems to have been extended. I would interpet that as a wife and children as his family. In this case it refers to his mother living here. He seems to be a prime candidate for deportation because of his crimes and the fact he was born and lived in Somalia. My objection to him staying is not because he is a muslim but because he is a rapist.
"He seems to be a prime candidate for deportation because of his crimes and the fact he was born and lived in Somalia"

well as we are seeing more and more frequently that counts for nothing!

we are a laughing stock
-- answer removed --
Does any other country make it so easy for criminals to escape deportation?

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Human Rights. Win For Somali Rapist..

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.