News1 min ago
Britain’S Supreme Court Will Be Able To Over-Rule The European Court Of Human Rights?
4 Answers
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/law -and-or der/105 42296/B ritains -suprem e-court -will-b e-able- to-over -rule-S trasbou rg-cour t-says- Chris-G rayling .html
Empty election promises or could this actually happen at last?
Empty election promises or could this actually happen at last?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ. currently the Tories cannot do anything without the agreement of the Lib / dems, isn't that right? so are they saying that if they win the next election it will be alone without a coalition,
from your link
Lord Judge said he had “no problem” with the fact that decisions made in Strasbourg had a bearing on English courts, but suggested that in some cases the final word should rest with the UK Supreme Court.
from your link
Lord Judge said he had “no problem” with the fact that decisions made in Strasbourg had a bearing on English courts, but suggested that in some cases the final word should rest with the UK Supreme Court.
//Lord Judge, who was the Lord Chief Justice until September, has repeatedly the unelected European Court of Human Rights should not impose rulings on the UK.//
That's a good one! - remind me who elects the Lord Chief justice and the rest of the judicary in the UK
Don't see how that would work unless the European Convention on human rights was changed which would take the agreement of all 47 signatories I'd think
That includes Turkey and Russia and Armenia and Albania etc.
Can't see that happening.
I shall await their plan with interest
That's a good one! - remind me who elects the Lord Chief justice and the rest of the judicary in the UK
Don't see how that would work unless the European Convention on human rights was changed which would take the agreement of all 47 signatories I'd think
That includes Turkey and Russia and Armenia and Albania etc.
Can't see that happening.
I shall await their plan with interest
The Supreme Court is not bound by its own decisions,follow the principle of 'stare decisis' [all right, I had to learn the ruddy stuff, Latin phrases and all; may as well use it!]
In principle,I see no reason why we shouldn't treat ECHR decisions as the Supreme Court treats its own, that is treat them as of persuasive effect only. I can see a reason connected with the original agreement which created the ECHR
In principle,I see no reason why we shouldn't treat ECHR decisions as the Supreme Court treats its own, that is treat them as of persuasive effect only. I can see a reason connected with the original agreement which created the ECHR
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.