ChatterBank6 mins ago
Help, Please Re The Mail
65 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-25 33320/P rivate- school- boy-17- died-hi t-taxi- walked- dual-ca rriagew ay-New- Years-E ve.html
Is there something irrelevant in that Daily Mail report ? What ,if anything is it, and why is it there?
Is there something irrelevant in that Daily Mail report ? What ,if anything is it, and why is it there?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FredPuli43. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.He attended Private School.
Stories like this make me wonder if he or the family were known to the journalist. It isn't really a national news story yet it is a very full account.
Didn't quite understand this bit?
// One witness, calling himself RJT, said: 'I was a witness to this tragic accident.
'I immediately called 999 but a car was on the way down. I tried to flag him down but could not and witnessed the impact. //
Stories like this make me wonder if he or the family were known to the journalist. It isn't really a national news story yet it is a very full account.
Didn't quite understand this bit?
// One witness, calling himself RJT, said: 'I was a witness to this tragic accident.
'I immediately called 999 but a car was on the way down. I tried to flag him down but could not and witnessed the impact. //
Fred.....LOL....I know where you are coming from, particularly the "Mail" entry into your headlines.
Newspapers are there to investigate and to report news and if there is no news then to find some........if they don't then they go out of business and there certainly is no chance of that with the Daily Mail?
Give the punters what they want and you will do well.....in your field Fred, medical expert witnesses give the solicitors what they want and one has a good income for life...........as with barristers.......-;)
News is short and the Political struggle between left and right is continuous and in the main....boring.
Now in answer to your question.....public schoolboy, well liked , good future ahead walks on a dual carriageway on the way home from a New Years Eve party and is killed.
Now if one had to choice between THAT incident and a p1ssed 18 year old falls from a balcony in Magaluf and is pronounced dead....which story would sell your paper?
It is a cruel world Fred.
Newspapers are there to investigate and to report news and if there is no news then to find some........if they don't then they go out of business and there certainly is no chance of that with the Daily Mail?
Give the punters what they want and you will do well.....in your field Fred, medical expert witnesses give the solicitors what they want and one has a good income for life...........as with barristers.......-;)
News is short and the Political struggle between left and right is continuous and in the main....boring.
Now in answer to your question.....public schoolboy, well liked , good future ahead walks on a dual carriageway on the way home from a New Years Eve party and is killed.
Now if one had to choice between THAT incident and a p1ssed 18 year old falls from a balcony in Magaluf and is pronounced dead....which story would sell your paper?
It is a cruel world Fred.
I'm struggling to find much wrong here. Young people like this are killed on a reasonably regular basis at this time of year. I can't see that there anything amiss in providing some personal details in the news report. A tragic event, that will have devastated this boys family.
Skoda cars are used as taxis pretty much everywhere in Britain, from my experience.
Skoda cars are used as taxis pretty much everywhere in Britain, from my experience.
It was the fact that he was at private school being headlined, plus the fees, that intrigued me. A 17 year-old boy is killed on a road. I tried alternatives Youth/ "benefits claimant/ Muslim/unemployed youth/State school pupil..killed" but none was any better.
So why did the paper choose these facts? Because the middle class would identify with the family: "There but for the grace of God goes our son". Because the readers are supposed to be more shocked at the death of someone from a rich or fairly rich family? Why?
So why did the paper choose these facts? Because the middle class would identify with the family: "There but for the grace of God goes our son". Because the readers are supposed to be more shocked at the death of someone from a rich or fairly rich family? Why?
/// Why is it there ///
A young life has been tragically lost, that is why it is there. Some also criticise why the fact that he went to a private school is relevant, it perhaps is not but newspapers try and make as much column space out of a story, especially on a slow news day.
But is this any difference from the regular stories of all those young lives that are lost through stabbings, and don't they also report that the victim had a great future in front of him, was well liked by his headmaster, who also adds that he was a valuable member of the school, who was soon to apply for a place at university.
Perhaps if this poor lad had been of a different skin colour FredPuli43 would not have been so criticising?
A young life has been tragically lost, that is why it is there. Some also criticise why the fact that he went to a private school is relevant, it perhaps is not but newspapers try and make as much column space out of a story, especially on a slow news day.
But is this any difference from the regular stories of all those young lives that are lost through stabbings, and don't they also report that the victim had a great future in front of him, was well liked by his headmaster, who also adds that he was a valuable member of the school, who was soon to apply for a place at university.
Perhaps if this poor lad had been of a different skin colour FredPuli43 would not have been so criticising?
Fred's right
Rerun the story with a kid from a Salford getting hit on the road at 3:30am and see the comments
I'd be all ' Why was he on a road, probably drunk at 3:30?' and ' I wouldn't let my kids out unsupervised at that time'
The school angle is clearly there to flag up to the readership where their sympathies need to lie
The Mail is telling their readers what to think again
Mind you from the comments it seems once again their readership isn't as stupid as they think it is!
Rerun the story with a kid from a Salford getting hit on the road at 3:30am and see the comments
I'd be all ' Why was he on a road, probably drunk at 3:30?' and ' I wouldn't let my kids out unsupervised at that time'
The school angle is clearly there to flag up to the readership where their sympathies need to lie
The Mail is telling their readers what to think again
Mind you from the comments it seems once again their readership isn't as stupid as they think it is!