Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
François Hollande
i don't get what all the fuss is about - isn't it the law in france for men to have a mistress?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bednobs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The issues are really twofold:
Firstly, every one loves a sex story involving attractive ladies and politicians, even if they won't admit it. And second, as one commentator in yesterday's press memorably put it: the debate is also about whether M Hollande also is doing to the French economy what he is presumably doing to his mistress.
Even as a supporter of the Parti Socialiste I still find that quite funny ...
Firstly, every one loves a sex story involving attractive ladies and politicians, even if they won't admit it. And second, as one commentator in yesterday's press memorably put it: the debate is also about whether M Hollande also is doing to the French economy what he is presumably doing to his mistress.
Even as a supporter of the Parti Socialiste I still find that quite funny ...
French gossip is very dull. The culture is such that nobody talks about the sex life of anyone; there is no "That woman at number 46 is no better than she should be" or anything like that. The conventional view is that a man who is cuckolded is a figure of fun, not sympathy, and a woman whose husband strays has only herself to blame; it's not his fault. And nobody wonders at the President straying, if that emerges. They think that any powerful and successful man is bound to attract women. If he is tempted to respond, well the law of averages suggests that he will. After all, the woman is one of hundreds or thousands, so the percentage is very low.
The privacy law is toothless, but symbolic. A paper which, or a person who, contravenes it only gets fined a small amount. The thinking is that the ignominy is such that the penalty need only be tiny.
The privacy law is toothless, but symbolic. A paper which, or a person who, contravenes it only gets fined a small amount. The thinking is that the ignominy is such that the penalty need only be tiny.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.