Motoring0 min ago
Sorry How Is 3 Years Too Harsh For This?
32 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -scotla nd-glas gow-wes t-25847 291
lowlife incompetant driver kills innocent so lets knock a third off. On what planet do out judges live?
lowlife incompetant driver kills innocent so lets knock a third off. On what planet do out judges live?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well because this guy was not wearing his glasses he knocked over a person and killed them an a zebra crossing, and got 140 hours community service.
So on that basis 4 years seems harsh !
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-25 35897/S hort-si ghted-d river-k illed-d og-walk er-pede strian- crossin g-wasnt -wearin g-glass es-gets -just-1 40-hour s-COMMU NITY-SE RVICE.h tml
So on that basis 4 years seems harsh !
http://
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
We shall have to wait for the reasons for the sentence reduction.
"Lord Bracadale, who heard the sentence appeal with Lord Kingarth at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh, said they would give full reasons for their decision to reduce the prison term at a later date."
Why do you call the driver a 'lowlife'? He had no previous convictions for driving or anything else and was in full-time employment.
"Lord Bracadale, who heard the sentence appeal with Lord Kingarth at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh, said they would give full reasons for their decision to reduce the prison term at a later date."
Why do you call the driver a 'lowlife'? He had no previous convictions for driving or anything else and was in full-time employment.
Danny, everyone who serves a determined prison sentence (for a given number of years) serves half the time in prison and half on licence.
If the sentence is for 12 months or less the second half is not on licence.
Sometimes the judge may state a minimum time that must be served in prison, for example sentenced to 6 years and must serve a minimum of 4 years in prison.
https:/ /www.go v.uk/ty pes-of- prison- sentenc e/deter minate- prison- sentenc es-fixe d-lengt h-of-ti me
If the sentence is for 12 months or less the second half is not on licence.
Sometimes the judge may state a minimum time that must be served in prison, for example sentenced to 6 years and must serve a minimum of 4 years in prison.
https:/
I did indeed read the full story and the appeal judges said that the original judge should not have used the phrase 'boy racer' as there was no evidence the driver was speeding.
He tried to overtake on a blind bend but managed to pull back in behind the bus. He then lost control of the vehicle.
He had bought the car 4 days earlier. The car was legal inasmuch as it was insured, taxed and had an MOT. It was found to have defective breaks and a faulty shock absorber which could have contributed to the accident, the defence claimed but the original judge disregarded this.
As I said earlier, we'll have to wait for the report giving the appeal judge's reasons.
He tried to overtake on a blind bend but managed to pull back in behind the bus. He then lost control of the vehicle.
He had bought the car 4 days earlier. The car was legal inasmuch as it was insured, taxed and had an MOT. It was found to have defective breaks and a faulty shock absorber which could have contributed to the accident, the defence claimed but the original judge disregarded this.
As I said earlier, we'll have to wait for the report giving the appeal judge's reasons.
Read these sentencing guidelines.
http:// news.bb c.co.uk /1/hi/e ngland/ somerse t/43920 92.stm
From the limited information we have from the various news reports then the driver is culpable of level 3 which has a sentencing guideline of 3 years custody with a range of 2 to 5 years.
There were no aggravating factors but there may have been mitigating factors as he was injured himself and he may have had limited driving experience.
I'll be interested to read the full report.
http://
From the limited information we have from the various news reports then the driver is culpable of level 3 which has a sentencing guideline of 3 years custody with a range of 2 to 5 years.
There were no aggravating factors but there may have been mitigating factors as he was injured himself and he may have had limited driving experience.
I'll be interested to read the full report.