Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Is This Not Offensive And Also Sexist To Certain Overweight White Peers?
20 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No. It is a parody.
The target of the joke is Lord Rennard. No other peers, be them white or black are the target. He is targeted for the joke due to his inappropiate behaviour to LibDem ladies.
Dasha Zhukova posed on a chair of a black woman trussed up black woman in a bondage position. It was quite striking, and had ever so slightly racist and sexist undertones.
The cartoonist has cleverly taken one story and applied it to another.
http:// www.mir ror.co. uk/news /world- news/ro man-abr amovich -girlfr iend-da sha-zhu kova-30 46971
The target of the joke is Lord Rennard. No other peers, be them white or black are the target. He is targeted for the joke due to his inappropiate behaviour to LibDem ladies.
Dasha Zhukova posed on a chair of a black woman trussed up black woman in a bondage position. It was quite striking, and had ever so slightly racist and sexist undertones.
The cartoonist has cleverly taken one story and applied it to another.
http://
An indepedent disciplinary investigation said his behaviour WAS inappropriate.
Just like a football disciplinary hearing can decide a player is guilty of violent conduct and penalise him.
It does not take a court and legal procedings to decide if behaviour is appropriate or not. Disciplinary hearings can do the same function without involving a prosecution.
Just like a football disciplinary hearing can decide a player is guilty of violent conduct and penalise him.
It does not take a court and legal procedings to decide if behaviour is appropriate or not. Disciplinary hearings can do the same function without involving a prosecution.
Gromit
/// An indepedent disciplinary investigation said his behaviour WAS inappropriate. ///
*** In June Rennard was questioned under caution, but by September the police announced that no further action would be taken. Despite this, the Liberal Democrat leadership launched an inquiry headed by Alistair Webster QC. ***
*** In his findings, Webster said that the peer had “violated the personal space and autonomy of the complainants,” but it could not be established “beyond reasonable doubt that Lord Rennard had intended to act in an indecent or sexually inappropriate way.” ***
Surely you can't argue with that, especially coming from a web site such as this.
http:// www.wsw s.org/e n/artic les/201 4/01/27 /renn-j 27.html
/// An indepedent disciplinary investigation said his behaviour WAS inappropriate. ///
*** In June Rennard was questioned under caution, but by September the police announced that no further action would be taken. Despite this, the Liberal Democrat leadership launched an inquiry headed by Alistair Webster QC. ***
*** In his findings, Webster said that the peer had “violated the personal space and autonomy of the complainants,” but it could not be established “beyond reasonable doubt that Lord Rennard had intended to act in an indecent or sexually inappropriate way.” ***
Surely you can't argue with that, especially coming from a web site such as this.
http://
AOG
Websters report said
// “...it is clear that he did not behave in the way that a Chief Executive should behave. Lord Rennard must reflect on his actions and apologise to the women involved.” //
That is inappropiate. Not indecent, not sexual, just inapropriate.
// Surely you can't argue with that, especially coming from a web site such as this. //
Just because you have found a daft website does not give it any authority.
Websters report said
// “...it is clear that he did not behave in the way that a Chief Executive should behave. Lord Rennard must reflect on his actions and apologise to the women involved.” //
That is inappropiate. Not indecent, not sexual, just inapropriate.
// Surely you can't argue with that, especially coming from a web site such as this. //
Just because you have found a daft website does not give it any authority.
Gromit
/// Just because you have found a daft website does not give it any authority. ///
World Socialist Web Site, a daft website?
I would have thought by it's very political leanings it would be just your 'cup of tea', but then what they have put is in disagreement with Gromit's so perhaps we all understand.
/// Just because you have found a daft website does not give it any authority. ///
World Socialist Web Site, a daft website?
I would have thought by it's very political leanings it would be just your 'cup of tea', but then what they have put is in disagreement with Gromit's so perhaps we all understand.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.