Food & Drink2 mins ago
Beyond A Joke
not sure what the parking warden or what passes for them these days was thinking,
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-leeds -260745 14
http://
Answers
It wasn't just a poor picture, it was a video. The driver explained several times that he was queueing in traffic and it was only when he refused to accept the ticket and demanded his day in court with the camera operator present that the council backed down. That's why it's news.
16:58 Fri 07th Feb 2014
If this chap had been handed a parking ticket by a traffic warden I could see the point of the media attention; or had he been forced to go to court or even take it to appeal.
As it is, it's just a clerk's error, quickly rectified.
Some motorists may have valid criticism of the police/council but not this time.
As it is, it's just a clerk's error, quickly rectified.
Some motorists may have valid criticism of the police/council but not this time.
http:// www.car toons.a c.uk/br owse/ca rtoon_i tem/any text=Tr affic%2 0warden ?page=4
This is Giles' take on traffic wardens, and it's from 1960, so nothing's changed.
This is Giles' take on traffic wardens, and it's from 1960, so nothing's changed.
actually i don't really think that, i was just kidding, i would like to give a good boot up the derriere to some of the wardens i have seen, two who pervade the area. They sit outside a local pub waiting for the unsuspecting motorist to park 10 seconds over the allotted time, and whack a penalty notice on the cars, some who are blue badge owners, a number who are severely disabled, even an ambulance, going to a person who had slipped on the pavement,
Traffic wardens are told to work on the basis of
'ticket absolutely everything however ridiculous and leave it for the motorist to appeal'.
They know that alot of people just pay up and don't bother appealing because of the hassle, so the council or whoever they subcontract the work to, make money. They've got nothing lose.
If they themselves had to pay a fine or compensation of top of refunding the money for every ticket they incorrectly issued, this kind of nonsense wouldn't happen.
'ticket absolutely everything however ridiculous and leave it for the motorist to appeal'.
They know that alot of people just pay up and don't bother appealing because of the hassle, so the council or whoever they subcontract the work to, make money. They've got nothing lose.
If they themselves had to pay a fine or compensation of top of refunding the money for every ticket they incorrectly issued, this kind of nonsense wouldn't happen.
i think some do for reasons already stated, that the hassle of it, time involved, and no outright proof they were in the right. I remember reading of someone who told the local council she was going on holiday for several weeks, but they either didn't get the missive or ignored it, her car was towed and crushed, not sure if i could find the link, but i should imagine she would have been rather annoyed...