Quizzes & Puzzles13 mins ago
Firearms Officer Wins Sex Discrimination Case Because Her Firearm Was Too Big For Her.
182 Answers
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/law -and-or der/106 43338/P etite-f irearms -office r-wins- sex-dis crimina tion-ca se-beca use-gun -was-to o-big-f or-her- hands.h tml
Well this just about takes the biscuit, why isn't there certain qualifications a person should reach before being accepted in certain positions in the police service?
Well this just about takes the biscuit, why isn't there certain qualifications a person should reach before being accepted in certain positions in the police service?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Just wading into this squabble, but it looks like she won the case becuase her superiors failed to ADJUST the gun:
'her trainers failed to adjust it while carrying out a test shoot on which her job depends.'
'asked on several occasions for a smaller and suitable grip on the weapon when they could not reach the trigger, but this did not happen.'
'her trainers failed to adjust it while carrying out a test shoot on which her job depends.'
'asked on several occasions for a smaller and suitable grip on the weapon when they could not reach the trigger, but this did not happen.'
Not only can the grip be adjusted, it appears, but, if it cannot, we have to assume that the police have a policy of recruiting people as firearms officers when those people won't be able to use the firearm. I'm prepared to believe that the police can be stupid, but prefer to think that the firearm is adjustable.
So now we have established that the said firearm can be adjusted, perhaps we can also assume that somehow the force could acquire properly fitting safety equipment too.
Would it then be cynical of me to wonder idly if this was a concerted effort to deter the 'petite' females from proceeding in their training?
Would it then be cynical of me to wonder idly if this was a concerted effort to deter the 'petite' females from proceeding in their training?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.