ChatterBank30 mins ago
Why Were This Family Allowed Into This Country In The First Place?
29 Answers
http:// news.sk y.com/s tory/12 31516/s tudents -family -lose-d eportat ion-bat tle
It was said that Yashika came to the UK from Mauritius in 2011 on a tourist visa to escape domestic violence, and it was only her who was first to be deported, but now the whole family.
Did they also come to this country on a tourist visa or were they already here?
We have all heard of the ECOHR stepping in and preventing such deportations on the grounds of a 'right to family life', but for our National airline and a bunch of school friends stepping in, what is going off?
It was said that Yashika came to the UK from Mauritius in 2011 on a tourist visa to escape domestic violence, and it was only her who was first to be deported, but now the whole family.
Did they also come to this country on a tourist visa or were they already here?
We have all heard of the ECOHR stepping in and preventing such deportations on the grounds of a 'right to family life', but for our National airline and a bunch of school friends stepping in, what is going off?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.sandyRoe
/// This young woman was working hard at her studies and in time would have contributed to our society. This seems a great shame. ///
Should we then conduct an open door policy to all, then to spend money educating them to see if they attain a certain level and if they do, they are then allowed to stay?
Something not quite right about this case, this from the Independent:
*** Speaking from Yarl’s Wood, Ms Bageerathi told The Independent of the incident that forced her and her family to flee, when a drug dealer entered her home drunk and “tried to rape me”. ***
*** “I refused to open the house door, it was just me and my younger siblings at home. He broke it down and came in, started hitting my sister and me, and tore my clothes. My mum came home from work before he could do anything.” ***
*** She added the man “says he has people waiting at the airport for us to come back”. ***
Yer, like they would continuously check all passenger names on all the various flight from the UK, just so that they could arrive at the airport at a given time?
It would seem that not only do they get unlimited 'Legal Aid' at our expense, but also the provision of top rate 'script writers'.
/// This young woman was working hard at her studies and in time would have contributed to our society. This seems a great shame. ///
Should we then conduct an open door policy to all, then to spend money educating them to see if they attain a certain level and if they do, they are then allowed to stay?
Something not quite right about this case, this from the Independent:
*** Speaking from Yarl’s Wood, Ms Bageerathi told The Independent of the incident that forced her and her family to flee, when a drug dealer entered her home drunk and “tried to rape me”. ***
*** “I refused to open the house door, it was just me and my younger siblings at home. He broke it down and came in, started hitting my sister and me, and tore my clothes. My mum came home from work before he could do anything.” ***
*** She added the man “says he has people waiting at the airport for us to come back”. ***
Yer, like they would continuously check all passenger names on all the various flight from the UK, just so that they could arrive at the airport at a given time?
It would seem that not only do they get unlimited 'Legal Aid' at our expense, but also the provision of top rate 'script writers'.
-- answer removed --
Here is Gerard Batten: UKIP MEP no less
agreeing that this girl is the sort of person we should be allowing to stay in our country
http:// www.cha nnel4.c om/news /catch- up/disp lay/pla ylistre f/25031 4
agreeing that this girl is the sort of person we should be allowing to stay in our country
http://
But rules are rules and they broke them. We should not discriminate on who we deport it should be based on whether or not that individual is entitled to be here.
Coming in on a tourist visa and over staying your welcome is criminal so they are not really any better than the criminals everyone wants to deport.
Who paid for the schooling? No doubt us tax paying mugs.
Coming in on a tourist visa and over staying your welcome is criminal so they are not really any better than the criminals everyone wants to deport.
Who paid for the schooling? No doubt us tax paying mugs.
/We should not discriminate on who we deport/
Really?
So no value judgement on, say their criminal record?
/it should be based on whether or not that individual is entitled to be here.
Coming in on a tourist visa and over staying your welcome is criminal/
If you stopped and thought about it ymb you'd realise that by definition, Asylum Seekers are not 'entitled to be here'
They come here regardless, then need to convince the authorities they are genuine and at risk if sent home. Their ability to contribute to the UK is also taken into account.
So by definition these are value judgements NOT rules of entitlement.
Really?
So no value judgement on, say their criminal record?
/it should be based on whether or not that individual is entitled to be here.
Coming in on a tourist visa and over staying your welcome is criminal/
If you stopped and thought about it ymb you'd realise that by definition, Asylum Seekers are not 'entitled to be here'
They come here regardless, then need to convince the authorities they are genuine and at risk if sent home. Their ability to contribute to the UK is also taken into account.
So by definition these are value judgements NOT rules of entitlement.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.