ChatterBank3 mins ago
Why Did The Bbc Give This Person Airtime To Voice His Opinions?
3 Answers
http:// www.the guardia n.com/u k-news/ 2014/ma r/26/le e-rigby -killer -brothe r-adebo lajo-sy mpathy- family
/// Jeremiah said on Wednesday that he was surprised when he first found out what his brother had done, but refused to expand further. He said he believed there was a link between the attack in Woolwich and UK foreign policy in Iraq and Afghanistan. But he said he believed his brother would not pose a danger to society if he was rehabilitated. ///
/// "Were he to be rehabilitated I think he would lead a productive life – I think it's important not to forget that he has young children himself." ///
Yes I am sure he would!!!!!!!!!!!!
/// Jeremiah said on Wednesday that he was surprised when he first found out what his brother had done, but refused to expand further. He said he believed there was a link between the attack in Woolwich and UK foreign policy in Iraq and Afghanistan. But he said he believed his brother would not pose a danger to society if he was rehabilitated. ///
/// "Were he to be rehabilitated I think he would lead a productive life – I think it's important not to forget that he has young children himself." ///
Yes I am sure he would!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Because as the brother of a newsworthy person he has a point of view not shared by many others.
The BBC did not 'give him airtime to voice his opinions' - It wasn't the 'Jeremiah Show'.
The BBC asked him questions and then screened some of his replies in what was presumably an edited version that complied with their editorial control.
And why not?
Are you advocating censorship aog?
Or just the denial of reality?
The BBC did not 'give him airtime to voice his opinions' - It wasn't the 'Jeremiah Show'.
The BBC asked him questions and then screened some of his replies in what was presumably an edited version that complied with their editorial control.
And why not?
Are you advocating censorship aog?
Or just the denial of reality?
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.