News0 min ago
"Inner Peace Will Come When Aids Does What It Should And Reduce African Density."
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.naomi24
Well I think it would have made more sense to keep him in. Perhaps a better tack would've been, "Whilst some may find his views extreme, he is entitled to them and UKIP Is broad church - we welcome those who would be otherwise silenced by the hierarchy of the establishment".
I genuinely think that could've worked for them.
As it is, they now come across as being just the same as the Coalition and Labour, where extreme views are not tolerated.
I personally find this young man's views quite astonishing, but I assume they are the product of his upbringing - should he not have a voice?
Shouldn't UKIP foster his free speech?
Well I think it would have made more sense to keep him in. Perhaps a better tack would've been, "Whilst some may find his views extreme, he is entitled to them and UKIP Is broad church - we welcome those who would be otherwise silenced by the hierarchy of the establishment".
I genuinely think that could've worked for them.
As it is, they now come across as being just the same as the Coalition and Labour, where extreme views are not tolerated.
I personally find this young man's views quite astonishing, but I assume they are the product of his upbringing - should he not have a voice?
Shouldn't UKIP foster his free speech?
sp,// I think it would have made more sense to keep him in…..Shouldn't UKIP foster his free speech? //
This is disingenuous. Had he been ejected from any other party you’d have applauded the action. However, you don’t want to see a party that opposes mass immigration succeed and so you wilfully encourage racism. Poor form, sp.
This is disingenuous. Had he been ejected from any other party you’d have applauded the action. However, you don’t want to see a party that opposes mass immigration succeed and so you wilfully encourage racism. Poor form, sp.
I think you are being unkind to the rank and file UKIP members and supporters, contary to popular labelling they are mostly people who are concerned about the soveriegnty of our country. Those are not at all worried about subjugation by a foriegn power seem to think that unless you agree with them then you are some sort of retard. UKIP like all parties attract the odd nutter and expell them. So I think you are being very insulting to the sensible masses for wanting to exclude a nutter. SP, this may come as a shock but not every one agrees with your views.
Surely the point here is, not that this tw*t has the views he has, but that he should have got through the checks and balances that Farage told us had been put in place after the last time this happened. Lampitt isn't a little weird....he is barking mad.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-2715 1509
This has happened with UKIP so often now, that we no longer find it surprising when it happens. And yet people keep saying that they support the Party ! Is it any wonder that I and others refer to UKIP as BNP-lite.
http://
This has happened with UKIP so often now, that we no longer find it surprising when it happens. And yet people keep saying that they support the Party ! Is it any wonder that I and others refer to UKIP as BNP-lite.
Careful mikey, that sounds a bit like the thought police. No one can know what private thoughts are held by members of any party and thus no one can know what they'll say or do when unguarded or perhaps when they think they can get away with it, remember Degsy? No doubt Labour have closet commies who want stalinism and no doubt there are devotees of the Nazis on the Tory side. Mostly they keep quiet though I imagine a few incidents have been hushed up in the commons bar after quaffing cheap pop!
Tora
They weren't private thoughts, they were published worldwide.
I would have thought any party that is picking a candidate for parliament would do a cursory check of the candidate's FaceBook Page, Twitter, LinkedIn and any other social media network they used. Such a check would only take a few minutes.
It is fair to assume that UKiP make no checks, which is why these own goals keep happening.
They weren't private thoughts, they were published worldwide.
I would have thought any party that is picking a candidate for parliament would do a cursory check of the candidate's FaceBook Page, Twitter, LinkedIn and any other social media network they used. Such a check would only take a few minutes.
It is fair to assume that UKiP make no checks, which is why these own goals keep happening.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.