Starmer Claims First Job Was On A Farm...
News0 min ago
"if You Shot One Poofter..."
Does this theory hold water?
Are UKIP so confident in their forthcoming electoral success, that they really don't care what their councillor now say and do.
This is from UKIP councillor, John Lyndon Sullivan:
"I rather often wonder if we shot one “poofter” (GLBT whatevers), whether the next 99 would decide on balance, that they weren’t after-all? We might then conclude that it’s not a matter of genetics, but rather more of education ;)"
Some might think that's a bit disgusting, whereas other might secretly applaud his stance.
But this...this is...just bloody...bloody...err...I have no adjective ready...
http://
Now, I know the normal response is "Well, there are people like this in all political parties, and the media and lefties are trying to deflect from the message of UKIP".
To which I might proffer the argument...
Two fat middle-aged blokes with Nazi tatts, snorting coke off a woman in a threesome.
What would Churchill / Disreli / Thatcher say?
How did we sink so low?
Are UKIP so confident in their forthcoming electoral success, that they really don't care what their councillor now say and do.
This is from UKIP councillor, John Lyndon Sullivan:
"I rather often wonder if we shot one “poofter” (GLBT whatevers), whether the next 99 would decide on balance, that they weren’t after-all? We might then conclude that it’s not a matter of genetics, but rather more of education ;)"
Some might think that's a bit disgusting, whereas other might secretly applaud his stance.
But this...this is...just bloody...bloody...err...I have no adjective ready...
http://
Now, I know the normal response is "Well, there are people like this in all political parties, and the media and lefties are trying to deflect from the message of UKIP".
To which I might proffer the argument...
Two fat middle-aged blokes with Nazi tatts, snorting coke off a woman in a threesome.
What would Churchill / Disreli / Thatcher say?
How did we sink so low?
Answers
I rather often wonder if we shot one Ukipite (Nfronter whatevers), whether the next 99 would decide on balance, that they weren’t after-all? We might then conclude that it’s not a matter of politics, but rather more of fashion.
15:32 Fri 16th May 2014
Bazile...I don't want to be unduly nasty to Kevin O’Doherty, but I think he has grown up quite a lot already ! In fact, from what I can see, there isn't much more growing up to do !
Svejk...exactly what is the correct "context" that this photo should be taken in then ? It can't be blamed on youthful exuberance, as I have pointed out to Baz ! Was there some deeper meaning that we have all missed ?
Svejk...exactly what is the correct "context" that this photo should be taken in then ? It can't be blamed on youthful exuberance, as I have pointed out to Baz ! Was there some deeper meaning that we have all missed ?
Reaction to this monstrosity from UKIP :::
“Where evidence is produced to indicate a breach it will be considered at the earliest opportunity by the National Executive Committee as part of an established disciplinary procedure.”
Can I suggest another, more appropriate response, along the lines of :::
" We are truly sorry and appalled that this candidate of ours has made a complete tw*t of himself and his party, and we offer our sincere apologies to the British public. It won't happen (much) again "
“Where evidence is produced to indicate a breach it will be considered at the earliest opportunity by the National Executive Committee as part of an established disciplinary procedure.”
Can I suggest another, more appropriate response, along the lines of :::
" We are truly sorry and appalled that this candidate of ours has made a complete tw*t of himself and his party, and we offer our sincere apologies to the British public. It won't happen (much) again "
/Svejk...exactly what is the correct "context"/
perhaps for svejk et al, the correct context is that the UKIP message is too important for any facts to get in the way especially those that indicate that some prominent representatives of UKIP are morons, perves or just unpleasant people we wouldn't want to be stuck next to at a party.
perhaps for svejk et al, the correct context is that the UKIP message is too important for any facts to get in the way especially those that indicate that some prominent representatives of UKIP are morons, perves or just unpleasant people we wouldn't want to be stuck next to at a party.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.