Religion & Spirituality4 mins ago
Did The Murderer In The Video Have A London Accent
?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I number myself among the lentil munchers. Having listened to the killers voice it seems likely he's not of an Asian background. A number of troubled young black men have looked for answers in Islam. All some of them have found is more trouble. It's probably he has a criminal record for relatively minor offences. It doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes...
I wouldn't be surprised if his parents or siblings are linked to the medical profession.
It is emerging that the Security Services have monitored many of the British IS members including recordings of their telephone conversations. If they do not know who he is yet, I suspect they will have a name soon.
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/wor ldnews/ middlee ast/ira q/11047 109/Bri tish-ji hadist- who-beh eaded-j ournali st-is-L ondoner -called -John.h tml
It is emerging that the Security Services have monitored many of the British IS members including recordings of their telephone conversations. If they do not know who he is yet, I suspect they will have a name soon.
http://
Right-on liberalism has a lot to answer for no matter what British accent it is.
The slur of 'Racist' from the left to shut anyone up who dared challenge the Blair Brown 'great' mulitcultural experiment is still ringing in my ears.
Cameron and Clegg have a lot to answer for too, they also failed to see what the rest of the population (bar the yoghurt knitters) knew all along.
The slur of 'Racist' from the left to shut anyone up who dared challenge the Blair Brown 'great' mulitcultural experiment is still ringing in my ears.
Cameron and Clegg have a lot to answer for too, they also failed to see what the rest of the population (bar the yoghurt knitters) knew all along.
To those who state that we should go back into Iraq and sort them out, I say this;
If we did there should be not politically correct 'rules of engagement' we should treat them as they do us, never mind those who then say "yes but that makes us no better than them".
Just remember those who were in agreement when one of our soldiers was imprisoned for shooting one of these low life?
If we did there should be not politically correct 'rules of engagement' we should treat them as they do us, never mind those who then say "yes but that makes us no better than them".
Just remember those who were in agreement when one of our soldiers was imprisoned for shooting one of these low life?
How long will it be before people start getting abducted in the UK and beheaded in car parks? -no seriously. Look at the atrocities perpetrated by the IRA in the UK in the 1970's which 20 years earlier would have seemed unlikely if not preposterous. If these terrorists were all in one place they could be dealt with swiftly as the Japanese were in 1945. Unfortunately they aren't, and the world is not dealing with a conscripted army but an Army of Religious Fundamentalists (nutters). I shudder to think what could happen. Education and a tight control on ghettos in London and the North West would be a start.
// Are you really naive enough into believing that his family and friends would tell the authorities, even if they knew he was one of theirs? //
His friends, or people who knew him will reveal who he is, if they are allowed to. We now know the security services have been monitoring him and that he calls himself "John". I have said from the beginning, they probably know exactly who he is and who is supporting him.
I can see why they would keep that from the public until now. While the security services do not reveal they know him, they can catch other people who implicate themselves by contacting with him. But there is now a clamour to know who he is, so they might have to release a name.
His friends, or people who knew him will reveal who he is, if they are allowed to. We now know the security services have been monitoring him and that he calls himself "John". I have said from the beginning, they probably know exactly who he is and who is supporting him.
I can see why they would keep that from the public until now. While the security services do not reveal they know him, they can catch other people who implicate themselves by contacting with him. But there is now a clamour to know who he is, so they might have to release a name.
To the parents of James Foley, I do not know you, I may never meet you, but what I've seen & read has disgusted me, your son was trying to do he job, he was doing his job reporting on the scum of the earth including this scum that's taken your son's life, no matter what has been said by these scum they will never ever be fit to stand in the same shoes as your son, my families thoughts are with you, & may your brave son RIP
Gromit
/// His friends, or people who knew him will reveal who he is, ///
Just as I thought 'naive'.
/// Alexander Blackman murdered an unarmed, wounded man. That is against our rules of engagement, and rightly so. ///
Exactly my point, it is acceptable for them to behead a soldier, or a media correspondent, but still hang on to our own 'rules of engagement' as if we are fighting a uniformed foe who also fights according to rules of the Geneva convention.
/// His friends, or people who knew him will reveal who he is, ///
Just as I thought 'naive'.
/// Alexander Blackman murdered an unarmed, wounded man. That is against our rules of engagement, and rightly so. ///
Exactly my point, it is acceptable for them to behead a soldier, or a media correspondent, but still hang on to our own 'rules of engagement' as if we are fighting a uniformed foe who also fights according to rules of the Geneva convention.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.