ChatterBank1 min ago
Tesco's Profits Hugely Overstated
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/bu siness- 2930644 4
Does anyone have any idea what has happened here ? It seem a lot more serious that just getting the decimal point in the wrong place, or a simple arithmetical error.
Does anyone have any idea what has happened here ? It seem a lot more serious that just getting the decimal point in the wrong place, or a simple arithmetical error.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I'm not surprised that the share price has collapased today, the question is where the financial control is....apparently, a missed slab of operating costs are the driver to this and something that the UK and Group Controller should have picked up on. They still don't have the final number tied down and it it could be more or less, the matter in Deloitte's hands now.
Meanwhile, there is the announcement on their new strategy - http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/Phra ses-and -Saying s/Jokes /Questi on13671 99.html
Meanwhile, there is the announcement on their new strategy - http://
It's a bit more than just costs Tesco has essentially tried to recognise revenue too early and delay the recording of costs until a later date. Accounting is not a hard science and some of this behaviour is acceptable, within limits. What Tesco appears to have done is push the boat out a bit too far, ending up with revenue that hadn’t really been earned yet and costs that probably should have been booked earlier. This would not have happened where I was as to projects and consultancy services - in fact it was the other way around, we could book costs as they were incurred, profit only taken when the revenue came in and the service completed - thereby minimising liability risks.
You might think that they could absorb this, but the loss of 250 is going to clobber their Return on Capital Employed which recently has been around 10% - it's going to take them down to under 8% and that is not acceptable in this sector with all the property involved. Secondly their net gearing has been slowly climbing with their (awful) store refits - now over 60% viz. 52% three years ago, so the debt coverage is needed.
depends how you calculate these things, TTT, £2bn off their value
http:// www.the guardia n.com/b usiness /2014/s ep/22/t esco-lo ses-2bn -value- 250m-pr ofit-ov erstate ment-in vestiga tion
You could be right, it could be a mistake; but DTC is more likely right that it's aggressive accounting that went way over the top.
http://
You could be right, it could be a mistake; but DTC is more likely right that it's aggressive accounting that went way over the top.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.