Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ChillDoubt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Mind boggling indeed.

it's the law, though. He committed the offence at a time when the law was inadequate. You can change the law but you can't change someone's sentence retrospectively.
Question Author
Might be better to put him in protective custody as I'm sure(or at least hope) South Wales Police are on some form of heightened alert over this release.
Whilst I understand the law is the law it ought to be circumvented in instances where the prisoner has not made one iota of effort to address his offending whilst in prison.
A sort of 'detained at Her Majesty's pleasure in order to preserve indivdual and public safety' type law is needed.
This is one of those occasions where the sword of the law is double-edged.

the fabric of the judicial system keeps everyone safe from unfair treatment, and that must include criminals like this.

It is a dreadful situation, but the law must be obeyed, until it can be changed.

If we cannot keep this sort of vermin locked up then the law needs amending.
Is this not a case of bungling by the authorities?
How can the presiding Judge not know the law and the sentencing?
there is such a law. But there wasn't when the crime was committed. And it cant' be invoked just because you don't like what somebody's done in the past. It's only available in the case of somebody who commits an offence while the law is in force.
Terrible, but the mistake was by the original judge who should have given say a 20 year sentence not an indeterminate one. In this case the judges hands were tied.
I get that his sentence was unlawful. What I don't get is why his sentence can't be reviewed, and keep him in in prison until it is, rather than let him out.

I really hope his picture is splashed all over the papers so that we can see what this monster looks like.
Question Author
This is why it would be far better for ALL concerned for him to remain in protective custody:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-30403467

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Very Dangerous Child Rapist Freed

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.