I think a difference was probably seen between an attack on a soldier and an attack on civilian journalists - the latter being seen as an assault on free speech, which (in theory) concerns everyone.
Yes P P I did turn up, and its nothing to do with this and now, more to do with other countries having a bit more get up and go and getting things done, unlike the soft british government who would hate to upset anyone
marches aren't getting things done, though. And British forces looked just as earnestly for the 7/7 perpetrators - and then shot the wrong guy. That was inept but it wasn't because anyone was soft or not bothered.
After 7/7 I dont recollect crowds taking to the streets chanting "no more underground bombs ! " we demand a bomb-free Tube ....
[but I could be wrong ]
Also, I think the Charlie Hebdo demonstration had something very tangible to protest against - the assault on freedom of speech and freedom of expression, whereas the Lee Rigby murder (and 7/7) are better served by a memorial service - and both got services where people could pay their respects.
sp, //I think the Charlie Hebdo demonstration had something very tangible to protest against - the assault on freedom of speech and freedom of expression, whereas the Lee Rigby murder (and 7/7) are better served by a memorial service //
Not tangible? A man hacked to death in cold blood by religious fanatics on the streets of London? Do you want to re-think that?
The murder of Lee Rigby and 7/7 were tangible events yes - you're right. I should have said that the Paris march had something very tangible to protest for.
sp, still not with you. I would have said both the slaughter of Lee Rigby and 7/7 which you also mentioned were very tangible and worthy of the strongest protest. I think the French are just more defiant and far less accommodating than the British.