Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 31rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Worshippers ?
Westerners?
Question Author
Old_Geezer

But wouldn't that be w*********s?
Question Author
DTCwordfan

Or in your case w********s
Oh you mean Walkers, or perhaps Weavers, Warders, Whalers, Wickers, Westers, or even Winners or Workers? How gauche.
Actually, AOG, a little bit insensitive as it's Haraam (forbidden) to masturbate in various sects of Islam, such as the Twelver school of the Shi'a denomination and all of its associated subdivisions. I thought you would have known that, so religously attuned that you are.
Question Author
DTCwordfan

/// Actually, AOG, a little bit insensitive ///

I am not in the least bothered about showing any insensitivity towards such as them or anyone else of their ilk, if it comes to that.
No wonder Britain is in the mess it is with such introspective views as that.
The *** on here will be out in force on that one AOG !
Question Author
DTCwordfan

/// No wonder Britain is in the mess it is with such introspective views as that. ///

And you are naive enough into believing that it is all down to views such as those, that the country is now in such a mess.

Take those rose tinted specs off and look around.

No, it's a pluralistic ***, sure, of which narrow-minded, bigoted views, such as that expressed, are just one strand. I would have thought better of you.
So DTC, you would prefer AOG to pamper to the fanatical Jihadists then?

I think we can all see where your sympathies lie.
-- answer removed --
And there are enough religious bigots of Christian persuasion to begin with. Let's start with Opus Dei and their extreme faction/version of Catholicism.
The other thing is whether this is in other rags as it's not unknown for the Express to come up with such garbage stories fabricated out of half-truths, taken out of context. Keeps the EDL and UKIP well fuelled, I supposed and Dirty Desmond in the lifestyle that he is used to.
//so zip it.//

Are, you would like to silence me. What a surprise, you are happy to take others to task but dislike being questioned yourself.

I asked you a question, I notice instead of a straight yes or no you have, unsuccessfully, attempted to avoid answering it.

Perhaps you would like to put the record straight with a simple yes or no to my question.
-- answer removed --
// "If you look at the definition of terrorism it is to incite fear into the hearts of people – this is what he is doing," //

er, no he isn't.
So we can't take criticism, tut.
This Muslim woman has the freedom to criticise Boris Johnson for " making sweeping statements that implies Muslim men are losers" I didn't notice Mussurut Zia crawl out of her hole and criticise the Muslims who killed Lee Rigby, London Bus bomb victims, Paris victims, 9/11 victims et al.
She should better consider her position as a loser because she is woman in her faith which she defends. She would have no media organ to spout her criticisms in a Muslim country!! Well I suppose she is making the use of her freedom of speech in this country while she still can!!

1 to 20 of 31rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is It Akin To Terrorism To Brand Religious Extremists As "w*****s" ?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.