Blair 'steps Back' From Middle East Peace Role

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2996113/Blair-steps-Middle-East-peace-role-amid-claims-no-credibility-region.html

'Stepping back' this judging the state of the Middle East this person should have been 'out on his ear' long ago.

[youngmafbog]

To be fair though AOG, a peace role in the Middle east is doomed to failure.

I think his Tonyness did actually mean well.

[Baldric]

///‘He has been ineffective in this job. He has no credibility in this part of the world.’///

Seems nothing changes by the look of things!

[ToraToraTora]

Gawd knows how he ended up do the job in the first place, having Blair as a peace envoy is like having Glitter as Nursery education envoy!

[Peter Pedant]

This is Life innit

someone who goes out in a blaze of glory - you end up wondering what the glitz was all about

and those who leave office with a whimper - their reputation improves with time.

Bliar was the first cateegory and I can tell you why he was so admired - he was a good ( liar)

[andy-hughes]

So what on earth is he doing that brings him into this conflict?

Will we ever find out?

I wonder ...

[Gromit]

He was always seen as too pro Israel which is why no one else took him seriously.

He wasn't elected to the role, he was foisted on the Middle-east by the US, EU and Russia who wanted to keep him out of mischief.

He was been ineffective on the role, but I'm not sure anyone else could have done any better considering the hatred either side have for the other.

[tonyav]

Lost all credibility !, I'm surprised that he had any to begin with.

[Bazile]

Let's face it , look how long this conflict been going on - noone over the years has been able to bring peace to the two sides .

love him or hate him - It's not suprising that he has been unable to do do anything , given the hatred between the two sides .

AOG - Who do you suggest would have brought the two sides to agreement ?