Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 24rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Avatar Image
he may just get my vote on that alone !
09:58 Tue 31st Mar 2015
he has a point..on the condition they are not allowed back...EVER !
Question Author
Thats what he say's, minty.

“We shouldn’t be worried about them flying there, just make sure they get there and they never come back because this country would be a lot safer without them.
Solves the problem over here, perhaps, but not particularly a good thing for the situation in Syria. Still, who cares? It's not like we're living in an increasingly global world where the events thousands of miles away are no longer disconnected from our own...
Many must be British, born and bred, how could they be kept out? The UKIP candidate hasn't thought this through.
tattoo their foreheads....ISIS activist !
Question Author
sandy, he say's if it were up to him.

“If it was up to me, I would charter some jets and take them over there and at the gates take their passports away and say ‘never come back’."
he may just get my vote on that alone !
Because obviously the politicians we need are those capable of coming up with an approach to the situation based on cack-handed reactionary drivel rather than, say the care a delicate situation like this needs.
What was the word Cameron used for people like this? Fruitcakes?
The truest thing he ever said and then he tried to deny it.
Absolutely: free flights for our enemies. Typical UKIP really: use the words 'foreigners out' with a thought to the consequences, be it a collapsing NHS or conniving with terrorists
what is wrong with purging the nation of terrorists ?
Question Author
Nothing imo, minty.
Basically the oil that the west needs is under the middle east.

The last thing we want is ISIS controlling our economy.

By facilitating additions to their ranks, you are helping their war effort.

Very dumb plan.
An extremely good idea if they all have non removable explosive vests fitted to them before they leave timed to detonate as they meet the rest of Isis.
// the care a delicate situation like this needs.//

Peace nick

Good idea if you ask me.
Peacenik? I've been advocating military action against ISIS pretty much from day one. I just don't think that trying to beat them militarily while at the same time providing fresh soldiers is the smartest of moves.

And the problem with sympathy is that it is open to interpretation, too. I can be sympathetic about the motives behind a situation while also having no desire to join it myself, or thinking that the actions are really justified.

In the case of ISIS I have no sympathy whatsoever, but the idea that having some -- any -- sympathy means that you want to join their ranks is absurd. As is this idea.
So what is the point of beating them in Syria if you leave a load in your own back yard.

With the HRA and liberal whiners we will still continue to be slaughtered on the streets at their will.

Put them in one place and they can be shot as soldiers of war and no longer a problem to the peace of the world.
Yes, good idea.
Is what a good idea?

The concept of shipping people abroad free of charge (although someone somewhere is going to have to meet the cost?

Or a prospective MP saying such inflamatory things in an election campaign?

In my view, neither is a good idea.
A good idea would be to fit a secret tracking device to them and then let a Yankee drone missile send them to their Islamic heaven where they can have free sex with virgins all day and all night.......Thinking about it,i wonder if they have room for me on their next flight out?
I wouldn't mind contributing to their one way tickets.

1 to 20 of 24rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is This A Good Idea.

Answer Question >>