The odds of drawing any particular selection of six numbers, be they {1,2,3,4,5,6} or {12, 16, 23, 24, 39 and 41} are the same. It's more of a human perception that, somehow, the second is "more random" than the first.
It is true that the odds of drawing any sequence consecutive numbers are lower overall than the odds of drawing any set of non-consecutive numbers, because of all the 14-million odd combinations in the lottery, only 43 of them are made from six consecutive numbers. It's also true that if you want to maximise your chances of being the sole winner, you should try to pick your numbers as randomly as possible. In particular, should the combination 1,2,3,4,5,6 ever pop up in a real draw then if you had picked it you would be likely to split the prize with quite a few people, so while i'ts no more or less likely than any other selection of six the rewards are much less than for a more random-looking choice of six numbers.
But that's not to do with the odds.