ChatterBank1 min ago
Is David Cameron Trying To Commit Political Suicide In Scoltand
48 Answers
What he said of course was true but the way he said it or the fact that he said it at all was not helpful given the toxicity of the debate in Scotland it could make more people determined to vote the SNP
http:// www.sco tsman.c om/news /politi cs/top- stories /indepe ndence- false-d ream-wi ll-fade -david- cameron -1-3756 564
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gordiescotland1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.In order to commit suicide first you need to be alive and the Tories have no life to speak of in Scotland. Cameron can't lose here: the more he bangs on (and he is largely correct in what he says) the more it probably currently hurts the SNPs opponents in Scotland , who are also his opponents.
So more a case of political GBH :-)
So more a case of political GBH :-)
The Tories lost the plot and the argument in 1997, when they were wiped out completely in Scotland. In the intervening years, they have only got one MP....hardly a record to boast about. He is wasting his time north of the Border and its indicative of his current lack-lustre performance across the board. dave is sleep-walking back to the back benches.
If the Tories can't see that it's a terrible thing for the UK as a whole that neither of the two main parties will have much, if any, real support in Scotland, then they seriously need to think a bit harder about what this will mean. In the first place it makes it very difficult if not impossible for either party to have realistic hopes of a majority. In the second place even a majority in parliament will have the shroud of relative illegitimacy as two -- if not three, as Wales may well follow suit -- of the constituent countries of the UK will have elected no representatives of the actual government. There is no way this can be thought of as an ideal situation.
Cameron was on about "ten days to save the Union". His anti-SNP rhetoric will only serve to hasten its demise.
Cameron was on about "ten days to save the Union". His anti-SNP rhetoric will only serve to hasten its demise.
How can you commit suicide when you are already dead? The Tories have no support in Scotland, In my opinion he should withdraw all party efforts anyway. He can say what he likes with no damage at all.
"...it could make more people determined to vote the SNP ..." nah ya think? PMSL by jove I think you've seen through the dastardly plan! Wipe out Ed in Scotland so he won't have enough seats, even for a coalition!
"...it could make more people determined to vote the SNP ..." nah ya think? PMSL by jove I think you've seen through the dastardly plan! Wipe out Ed in Scotland so he won't have enough seats, even for a coalition!
Gromit
/// The Tories are ruthless when their leaders are lame ducks. They dumped Thatcher when she went toxic. IDS was removed as leader and he never faced a General Election. ///
Perhaps it is because they have plenty of leader quality to choose from, unlike Labour, if they get rid of Red Ed who else do they have?
/// The Tories are ruthless when their leaders are lame ducks. They dumped Thatcher when she went toxic. IDS was removed as leader and he never faced a General Election. ///
Perhaps it is because they have plenty of leader quality to choose from, unlike Labour, if they get rid of Red Ed who else do they have?
"Do you believe the Conservatives will stick with Cameron if he fails to win a majority? " - yes Gromit, if he's the PM, then he'll go by arrangement in 2018. If he's not the PM then he'll go on his own. The Tories will be the largest party so there is a good chance he'll still be PM after the election. Sorry Labour luvvies this is slipping from Ed, JimmyK is driving the Labour voters away. Oddly enough even the Limp Dums are starting to look better than they did a few weeks ago.
It is clear that May and Johnson have positioned themselves as the next leader. Whether that demonstrates a wealth of talent is a matter of opinion. Cameron's replacement is more of a open debate precisely because he was seen to fail in 2010 when he failed to win the election. I don't believe if he fails to win for a second time that he will remain leader.
Ed's replacement is less clear because until he fails to win an election, he is fairly safe in his position. As to his successor, they will make themselves known when it is appropriate.
Ed's replacement is less clear because until he fails to win an election, he is fairly safe in his position. As to his successor, they will make themselves known when it is appropriate.
At the moment the Tory Party's only chance of a majority is if they can frighten UKIP voters into returning, grudgingly, to the fold. What a sorry state of affairs that would be if so. I'd love to see the electorate stick two fingers up to the main parties in England (it's already happening in Scotland). Maybe then they'll wake up and see what a failure they are in the eyes of the people.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.