Is It Snowing In Your Neck Of The Woods?
ChatterBank0 min ago
Just What Sort Of Message Does This Send Out?
13 Answers
http://
She described Bradbury as "dangerous" and said the consequences of his offending had been widespread and "devastating" for the victims and their families.
Lady Justice Hallett, who described Bradbury's offending as "wicked", said the court agreed with the sentencing judge that "a total figure of 22 years was appropriate"
But she said they believed that a "better way both to punish the appellant and protect the public" was to "restructure the sentence".
ie let him out early.
Just how does her mind work that out? The public - ie the young are surely safest with him bend bars.
I reckon she has lost her marbles.
She described Bradbury as "dangerous" and said the consequences of his offending had been widespread and "devastating" for the victims and their families.
Lady Justice Hallett, who described Bradbury's offending as "wicked", said the court agreed with the sentencing judge that "a total figure of 22 years was appropriate"
But she said they believed that a "better way both to punish the appellant and protect the public" was to "restructure the sentence".
ie let him out early.
Just how does her mind work that out? The public - ie the young are surely safest with him bend bars.
I reckon she has lost her marbles.
Answers
1 to 13 of 13
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Female judges seem to be giving women a bad reputation.
http://
http://
>>>how's that work, Buenchico?
If I'm honest, Jno, I'm not really sure!
People sentenced to more than 4 years in prison can normally apply for release at the half way stage. However, unlike sentences of less than 4 years, it's not automatic. If they don't get released they can keep reapplying (annually, I think) up until they've served two thirds of their sentence, when release does then become automatic.
However the courts have powers to amend the way that sentencing works in certain cases (which, as I've indicated, I don't fully understand). It seems, from the BBC report about the case, that such powers have been used in the 'restructuring' of the sentence, which also means that the offender will remain on licence (after being released from prison) for 6 years longer than he otherwise would have been:
http://
If I'm honest, Jno, I'm not really sure!
People sentenced to more than 4 years in prison can normally apply for release at the half way stage. However, unlike sentences of less than 4 years, it's not automatic. If they don't get released they can keep reapplying (annually, I think) up until they've served two thirds of their sentence, when release does then become automatic.
However the courts have powers to amend the way that sentencing works in certain cases (which, as I've indicated, I don't fully understand). It seems, from the BBC report about the case, that such powers have been used in the 'restructuring' of the sentence, which also means that the offender will remain on licence (after being released from prison) for 6 years longer than he otherwise would have been:
http://
This has nothing to do with the sex of the Judge. There were three Judges and only one was a woman, so I think we can dispense with that red herring.
As I understand it, Bradbury could actually spend longer behind bars with the new sentence. Anyway, when he is released, he will still be on licence and it will be very difficult for him to work with children again.
But at least he was caught and put behind bars. I am much more concerned about all the paedophiles that have not been even charged, especially the rich and famous ones that have evaded arrest due to their connections with the "establishment"
As I understand it, Bradbury could actually spend longer behind bars with the new sentence. Anyway, when he is released, he will still be on licence and it will be very difficult for him to work with children again.
But at least he was caught and put behind bars. I am much more concerned about all the paedophiles that have not been even charged, especially the rich and famous ones that have evaded arrest due to their connections with the "establishment"
I agree with the judges
we werent in court nor had the advantage of reading the notes of the original case
The average inside for murder is 11 y
and there are certain non-capital offences that routinely earn more ( drug smuggling ) and you know I dont think smuggling drugs is worse than murder. I put sex offences in the same category
we werent in court nor had the advantage of reading the notes of the original case
The average inside for murder is 11 y
and there are certain non-capital offences that routinely earn more ( drug smuggling ) and you know I dont think smuggling drugs is worse than murder. I put sex offences in the same category
1 to 13 of 13
