Here's a purely imaginary scenario, but picture this...
Many thousands of poverty-stricken and persecuted Irish people see France as a sort of paradise. Clearly, they try to use the UK as a jumping-off point in order to get there, given that we are the nearest landfall on their journey eastwards.
Would the French authorities be sending us millions of pounds/euros to help us deal with the chaos in the Dover/Ashford areas? If you believe that, you’ll believe anything! Why then should we be giving them financial support?
More to the point perhaps, would the British authorities have allowed these even to become or remain sites of chaos, as the French have around Calais? (Having said that, in some ways they ARE chaotic now in the sense that the people of Kent are effectively besieged by massive traffic build-ups on this side of the Channel.)
Having said all of the above, I think the UK should take some responsibility for the migrants, given that we are part of the EU and, if a union means anything, it should involve sharing. Cameron’s “solution” of sending warships to the Mediterranean to pluck survivors from the water is all very noble, but just dropping them off in Italy thereafter is not good enough. Some system based perhaps on size, economy and so on of allocating them throughout Europe should be found. Clearly, Greece could not be expected to cope as well as Germany, for example.
Just saying, “Send them back!” is pointless, since we have no idea where ‘back’ is. The plain truth is that throughout the whole of human history, there have been mass migrations and we are in the midst of one right now.