If You Go Down To The Woods Today

[-Talbot-]

This teddy bear won't be having a picnic!



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3208660/Child-abuse-wicked-sort-Shocking-new-ISIS-video-shows-baby-faced-three-year-old-boy-behead-TEDDY-BEAR.html

[ToraToraTora]

well the R.O.P. start em young talbot!

[-Talbot-]

Ownership of the video is not confirmed but you have to be seriously sick to let your child do that in a clearly choreographed sketch.

[Baldric]

///The forced finger-printing of children ?
What...in case they are naughty in School perhaps ?///

How about this one then?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3208660/Child-abuse-wicked-sort-Shocking-new-ISIS-video-shows-baby-faced-three-year-old-boy-behead-TEDDY-BEAR.html

[Svejk]

Awful, isn't it. I wonder will the friends of the RoP be along to defend this one?

[-Talbot-]

This thread won't exist to some posters, that is why it is hard to respect their tunnel vision views


See, hear, speak, no evil.

[Mamyalynne]

Innocent children will do anything to please the adult they think loves them.

Vicious vile adults just the same.

[andy-hughes]

What is the point of these pictures?

To prove that IS have no morality when it comes to using their children for propaganda?

I think we already know that - so why give them the oxygen of publicity by talking about it.

IS are inhuman monsters.

Yup - I got that several years ago.

There is nothing new here.

[-Talbot-]

You must do it deliberately, andy?

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - "You must do it deliberately, andy? "

Sorry - you've lost me - do what?

[andy-hughes]

divebuddy - "//What is the point of these pictures? //

Indeed. But shouldn't that question be addressed to IS."

No point - they know what the pictures are for - to outrage the Western media, and increase their profile.

My point is that passing on the pictures and allowing ourselves to be outraged simply makes sure that they fulfil their function.

Far better to ignore them - ignored propaganda is pointless propaganda

[-Talbot-]

andy-hughes
I think we already know that - so why give them the oxygen of publicity by talking about it.




Why don't you take your own advice, andy?

Katie Hopkins spouts shallow hate-bait




Yup - I got that several years ago.
There is nothing new there.




Yet you still post and post and post about her!

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - are you comparing IS propaganda with Katie Hopkins?

Are you???

Seriously?????

[-Talbot-]

so why give them the oxygen

so why give her the oxygen

[whiskeryron]

Children copy adults & they are only children, but what would be the outcome if western troops were attacked by highly trained ISIS children ? ISIS know how we are bred to revere children & I predict they will use that knowledge to try & get the upper hand in a future attack.

[-Talbot-]

Only an idiot would even think I was comparing IS propaganda with Katie Hopkins.


You were not thinking I was comparing IS propaganda with Katie Hopkins were you, andy?

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - "Only an idiot would even think I was comparing IS propaganda with Katie Hopkins.


You were not thinking I was comparing IS propaganda with Katie Hopkins were you, andy? "

Er - you posted it, not me!

[-Talbot-]

You did,



andy-hughes

Talbot - are you comparing IS propaganda with Katie Hopkins?

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - as I see it - Katie Hopkins makes a career as media hate-bait, and fully accepts the abuse she gets for doing so, and doubtless laughs all the way to the bank. If (and usually only if) she is mentioned, I admit bashing her is a bot of a hobby horse of mine - and on here, I do have a bit of a rant.

Now to switch the subject under debate - IS are publishing these pictures to hurt and enrage us, being the child lovers that we are, and they are clearly not.

So there is no comparison - until, as I understood it, you made one.

So in the interests of not dragging this off-thread - I am happy to acknowledge that I may have misunderstood the point of your reference to Katie Hopkins, so we can carry on and park that there.

deal?