Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The woman is a grasper.

The money was given for his care, she should not be able to get her grubby mits on it or the tax payers will be landed with his care bill on top of the compo paid out whilst she lords it.
It appears not AOG!

And while I am posting - I would not wish to offer any support to her either - she has behaved appallingly, and appears to continue to do so.
Not me, dreadful woman.
Words fail me,which is probrobably a good job as not trying to describe this woman would in all likelyhood get me banned.

None whatsoever from me, she should be ordered to repay at least the second £300k for the rebuild if there is any justice!
No sympathy from me,....disgusting selfish, cold hearted woman!
Poor, poor man; my heart goes out to him.
Where are the lawyers who so love to take on a case that they consider unjust?. Not falling over themselves here to represent this wronged man are they.
Togo the lawyers for the man ARE working free of charge!
// But Mrs Vaughan insisted that despite the fact her husband could only communicate via hand and eye signals at the time, he had taken an active role in all the decisions involving the purchase of Pinewoods.//

I think this is worth exploring further. The report is not balanced and there is no comment from Mrs Vaughan's representative.


1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Is There Anyone Out There Who Could Show The Least Bit Of Support For This Woman?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.