Increasingly, it appears so.
Leon Brittain was not blessed with the most pre-possessing of physical appearences, and as a society, we are always keen to associate a 'look' with a 'behaviour'.
To put it bluntly - because Lord Brittan could be perceived as someone with dubious secrets based on his appearance, it is a short leap (well, more of a hop in media terms!) to make the assumption that he 'must be weird'.
Of course, this is utterly unfair, but once that genie is out of the bottle, people will take the story and run with it, even though no credible evidence is produced to support it.
It's a modern equivalent of McCarthyism, and we must beware of seeing abusers around every corner, simply because - as in this case - their unwillingness to accept going bald, and a somewhat basic assemblage of facial features tags them as a pevert.
I hope that all involved hang their heads in shame, that an apparently innocent man went to his death in the midst of having his reputation comprehensively destroyed by a combination of the individual absence of a sense of humour, which was then compounded by the national absence of a sense of right and wrong.